d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Martial Arts, Boxing & Wrestling > Started Taking Wing Chun
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 32,060
Joined: Mar 7 2007
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jun 14 2011 12:36am
Quote (FatZero @ Jun 14 2011 06:31am)
This isn't even worthy of an intelligence response.

By this thought process Sumo is practiced by the US military.


I'm sure principals of sumo are shared with the US military.


Like to knock your opponent off balance.


I said it broadly on purpose.


///e


to put it in your words


I said it "vaguely" on purpose, because it was not a critical statement and I wanted it to be left open to interpretation somewhat.


but no matter how you look at it, with my interpretation it is correct and the way I intended it to be taken, is correct.


Do you just like to argue, or is it me specifically?

This post was edited by MrJoshua on Jun 14 2011 12:38am
Member
Posts: 50,357
Joined: Feb 15 2007
Gold: 150.00
Warn: 100%
Jun 14 2011 12:37am
Quote (MrJoshua @ 13 Jun 2011 23:36)
I'm sure principals of sumo are shared with the US military.


Like to knock your opponent off balance.


I said it broadly on purpose.


You didn't state it broadly.

Let me quote you for your own reference.

Quote
"I would really suggest Krav Maga, it was developed in Isreal and is mostly used by the military/police personel including the isreali special forces, and is even part of the cirriculum I believe for many of the unarmed combat courses taught in USA's various branches of the military."


You falsely represented Krav Maga as an articulate of the US military's combative training regiment and used a weak fringe argument to support your vague and inaccurate statement.

Clearly you didn't intend for this to be representative that a "jab" was going to be the defining factor that "Krav Maga is part of the "cirriculum"


Quote
I said it "vaguely" on purpose, because it was not a critical statement and I wanted it to be left open to interpretation somewhat.


but no matter how you look at it, with my interpretation it is correct and the way I intended it to be taken, is correct.


Sadly, I can look at it many ways and all of your interpretations are still incorrect and grossly misleading. Additionally one of the laws of communication is that "Meaning's are in people" What this means is that it doesn't matter what your intent was when you communicate, its how the audience received the message, and you clearly stated that Krav Maga was a part of the "cirriculum" of the US Military.

This post was edited by FatZero on Jun 14 2011 12:40am
Member
Posts: 32,060
Joined: Mar 7 2007
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jun 14 2011 12:39am
Quote (FatZero @ Jun 14 2011 06:37am)
You didn't state it broadly.

Let me quote you for your own reference.



You falsely represented Krav Maga as an articulate of the US military's combative training regiment and used a weak fringe argument to support your vague and inaccurate statement.

Clearly you didn't intend for this to be representative that a "jab" was going to be the defining factor that "Krav Maga is part of the "cirriculum"



thats still pretty broad, I said part of the cirriculum, even if it is only a ten second lesson, it is still part of the cirriculum

i never said which part, i never said or intended to imply that they reffer to it as krav maga, it just means that principals are taken from ,or even shared with krav maga.



Like I said, is it just me? or do you really like to get anal and argue?
Banned
Posts: 515
Joined: Jun 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jun 14 2011 12:40am
i will punch u in the face and your wing chun will be nulled come at me with that bullshit ill knock u out. lol
Member
Posts: 32,060
Joined: Mar 7 2007
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jun 14 2011 12:45am
Quote (00001111 @ Jun 14 2011 06:40am)
i will punch u in the face and your wing chun will be nulled come at me with that bullshit ill knock u out. lol


he could be right


but he could just as easily be wrong


perhaps he has never heard of the "centerline" theory, and how it applies to simultaneous striking/deflecting


I'd like to see him come in and throw some straight jabs at a true trapping expert...
Banned
Posts: 515
Joined: Jun 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jun 14 2011 12:49am
Quote (MrJoshua @ Jun 13 2011 11:45pm)
he could be right


but he could just as easily be wrong


perhaps he has never heard of the "centerline" theory, and how it applies to simultaneous striking/deflecting


I'd like to see him come in and throw some straight jabs at a true trapping expert...


lol..jabs seem to work fine for anderson silva lmk
Member
Posts: 810
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 69.50
Jun 14 2011 06:40am
Quote (00001111 @ Jun 14 2011 08:49am)
lol..jabs seem to work fine for anderson silva lmk


:D
Member
Posts: 16,718
Joined: Mar 17 2006
Gold: 58.00
Jun 14 2011 10:18am
Quote (MrJoshua @ Jun 14 2011 12:10am)
I am enrolled in a jeet kune do school, my sifu is a direct student of dan inosanto, who was a direct student of bruce lee; If you know bruce lee you definately should know JKD is wing chun based.


I actually kind of like the attitude of wing chun more than most other martial arts because it seems like it is more onslaught until the threat is gone versus being part of  and intermixed with the chaos(in a situation with multiple attackers)

All of these people telling you BJJ for real life combat are either complete idiots or just to much of a fanboy of UFC to know what they are talking about.


In a real life situation the last place you want to be is fighting from the ground,
you'd be better off doing like you said and just slipping away and running.


in terms of lethality, one defining line for the police to use deadly force is if they are up against a hard object, such as a brick wall or the ground, if they are being attacked while pressed against such an object they have the choice to respond with deadly force (I.E. beat you to death, or shoot you)


If you kick someone in the head, their legs/back/head/neck can all pivot backwards and absorb some of the force. also your skull has a certain bit of flexibility or give, even if it is unnoticable in terms of human senses.


But if you have your head against the wall or the ground your head has no where to go and the only absorbing force is that formentioned flexibility of the skull, which in itself can cause brain damage, so your brain is aborbing 99%, if not all of the force.



Especially in the situation where you mentioned "a trap" for your drugs or what have you, that would more than likely be set up by multiple offenders, so while you're on the ground dilly dallying around playing fag cuddle with one of the offenders appendages, another one has already run off with your supplies, and one or two more of them are busy stomping on your head while you hold the other one for comfort.



In a real life situation, standing and punching, kicking, trying to yank and pull away would be in my opinion more effective, and MUCH SAFER.


Wing Chun is a good choice my man, a lot of its moves teach you to knock down your opponent while keeping your balance and staying on your feet, which will open that window for you to escape.


The only really criticizing comments I have is that as I assume a paramedic or ambulance driver you are most likely in a confined space, and even sometimes encumbered with bags/carts/boxes/carrying a patient, and wing chun is not really as suited for confined spaces or having your hands full/encumbered.


For someone that is in a confined space or carrying stuff/wearing a uniform/accessories, etc; I would really suggest Krav Maga, it was developed in Isreal and is mostly used by the military/police personel including the isreali special forces, and is even part of the cirriculum I believe for many of the unarmed combat courses taught in USA's various branches of the military.


I hope this helps, or at least not TL;DR



INB4TLDR




100% agree with the bolded part
Member
Posts: 47,610
Joined: Jul 17 2008
Gold: 25.00
Jun 14 2011 10:26am
Quote (MrJoshua @ Jun 13 2011 10:39pm)
thats still pretty broad, I said part of the cirriculum, even if it is only a ten second lesson, it is still part of the cirriculum

i never said which part, i never said or intended to imply that they reffer to it as krav maga, it just means that principals are taken from ,or even shared with krav maga.



Like I said, is  it just me? or do you really like to get anal and argue?


It's a discussion sub-forum and you were wrong. What did you think was going to happen?
Member
Posts: 20,646
Joined: Apr 10 2008
Gold: 6,970.00
Jun 14 2011 11:37am
Quote (MrJoshua @ 13 Jun 2011 22:10)
All of these people telling you BJJ for real life combat are either complete idiots or just to much of a fanboy of UFC to know what they are talking about.

In a real life situation the last place you want to be is fighting from the ground

Saw this bolded in another quote, and wanted to address this.

In a "real life" situation, it may or may not be advantageous to be on the ground. You can't just make a blanket statement like that, and expect it to be applicable 100% of the time.

Would you wanna be rolling around on the ground in an alley littered with broken glass and discarded syringe needles? No, but I make it a point not to regularly stroll through alleys littered with glass and needles. =p

Would you want to tie up with someone on the ground while five of his buddies tap-dance on your head? Of course not, but the bias I've seen from some traditional Martial Arts people is... puzzling. They seem to think that someone who studies BJJ or grappling will automatically tie up with the first person in a multiple-person scenario, and go to the ground.

I think we can all agree that, in a multiple-assailant scenario, being tied up prone on the ground while a bunch of other people can stomp on yer noggin is probably a bad idea. I don't know why it is that so many people in the TMA community think that a person who studies BJJ or grappling of some sort would think it's a good idea, as if their training overrides common sense.

However, on a 1v1 situation, in an environment that is favorable to it, I've found that BJJ / grappling tools are EXTREMEMLY useful. It's been my experience (from being on the receiving end!) that someone trained exclusively in striking is pretty well f?!ked when they get taken to the ground.

Being able to stand and strike is good in theory, but it's nice to have a Plan B, if Plan A goes south.
Go Back To Martial Arts, Boxing & Wrestling Topic List
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll