Quote (MrJoshua @ 13 Jun 2011 22:10)
All of these people telling you BJJ for real life combat are either complete idiots or just to much of a fanboy of UFC to know what they are talking about.
In a real life situation the last place you want to be is fighting from the ground
Saw this bolded in another quote, and wanted to address this.
In a "real life" situation, it may or may not be advantageous to be on the ground. You can't just make a blanket statement like that, and expect it to be applicable 100% of the time.
Would you wanna be rolling around on the ground in an alley littered with broken glass and discarded syringe needles? No, but I make it a point not to regularly stroll through alleys littered with glass and needles. =p
Would you want to tie up with someone on the ground while five of his buddies tap-dance on your head? Of course not, but the bias I've seen from some traditional Martial Arts people is... puzzling. They seem to think that someone who studies BJJ or grappling will automatically tie up with the first person in a multiple-person scenario, and go to the ground.
I think we can all agree that, in a multiple-assailant scenario, being tied up prone on the ground while a bunch of other people can stomp on yer noggin is probably a bad idea. I don't know why it is that so many people in the TMA community think that a person who studies BJJ or grappling of some sort would think it's a good idea, as if their training overrides common sense.
However, on a 1v1 situation, in an environment that is favorable to it, I've found that BJJ / grappling tools are
EXTREMEMLY useful. It's been my experience (from being on the receiving end!) that someone trained exclusively in striking is pretty well f?!ked when they get taken to the ground.
Being able to stand and strike is good in theory, but it's nice to have a Plan B, if Plan A goes south.