Quote (Poonisher @ Jul 14 2020 01:15pm)
If this was for an option of which newest tech startup IPO to invest in those things would actually matter.
The whole list of guys there clearly managed their careers better based on the point of op's picture.
All of these men were/are better athletes and fighters than the entertainer. As per their track record.
Just as we don't measure a strongmans strength by his ability to get girls phone numbers.
We don't use a persons fame or bank account to measure their fighting prowess.
Or else Jeff Bezos is the greatest fighter of all time.
A lot of irony in this post, and unrelated metaphors that make ABSOLUTELY no sense.
Essentially what you're saying is the guys who fought more fights than Conor, while taking more damage and making a substantially lower amount of money managed their careers better? Interesting.
You and a lot of people seem to think title defenses are the only thing that matters, and the most important thing. If he defended his belt against 10+ bums would you still hold that same thought process?
Who cares that he dismantled Jose aldo with 1 punch, destroyed top tier fighters while making it look easy, put on exciting fights. none of that matters according to you guys because he "didnt defend a belt" lmao
Some backwards thinking. Conor managed his career better than anyone has in MMA.
This post was edited by Fromage on Jul 17 2020 12:59pm