There's never been a fighter in the history of the UFC that has refused to defend a title. They say you're not the champ till you defend the belt, so does that make conor the worst "champ" ( if you can call him that ) in ufc history? Even michael bisping defended his title, and people try to say he was the worst champ ever. But i think that belongs to conor, and you can't even really consider him a champ because he's never defended a title. Will conor go down as the worst "champion" the ufc has ever had?

champ champ*

might have to remake thread

You're not a champ till you defend the belt, so he's technically not even a 1 divisional champ. You're a fan of a fraud LOL, it shows how classless mcgregor fans are.

Dagestan prince ran conor from the ufc

the ufc isn't worthy of king mcgregor

Then Lord made Billy ran from the forum

would be good if he defends a belt for once
im really surprised they didnt strip him from his belt already

How many points can we get out of your statement:

Fight styles and Self promoting characters are what fans desire and follow. (Ali - Conor - etc which can be further broken down)

He took away two belts from two different current champions at the time. (Good enough "champ" title for most, but not an undisputed champion etc)

You are not showing much class in any of this. (Hypocrisy)


Side note: I dislike how Conor is degenerating as a fighter/champion. (He was a wild monkey to begin with, so it's no surprise what he will do with a little negotiating power)