You're confusing your stupidity with mine.

Still looking for a computer? PM me, I'll try and help

Probably didn't tell him to get an hp, compaq, or acer did you?

Which validates my point.

Keep talking, the more you do the more you look pathetic.

And if you had read any of my comments I believe I stated that providing proof from the internet that a laptop brand is > than others is fucking useless, it varies from reviewer to reviewer and no one wanting to do demanding applications will purchase a compaq or hp, ever.

Ever hear of a gamer playing top ends on an hp? Ever hear a video editor doing so on an acer? Ever hear an encoder working on a compaq?

No, no, no. Why? Because the laptops of those brands chronically overheat, BSoD doing so, or flat out do not have the power behind them to do so.

My ridiculous blanket statement stands, mouth breather.

This post was edited by GEZodiac on Jul 11 2011 01:10am

Out of the choices he gave me, I told him what his best choices were, considering price as well as the level of performance he would need for his desired applications. One of them was an HP, yes. So try again.

The especially ironic part of your statement is that I'm at work and my work computer is an $8,000 HP Z800 workstation, so I know someone who renders complex 3D models on an HP. If you know absolutely anything about 3D-rendering computers, you know that they would make your normal gaming PC look like a Ti-83 calculator. In addition, who gives a flying fuck about people attempting to play games or do video editing on a laptop? Anyone who is even semi-serious about it will obvious be doing this on a desktop. So try again.

Performance is completely based off of the specs of the computer. You can option out just about any laptop with the best/worst hardware on the market, so you can't call out a particular brand for not having enough power. So try again.

None of these brands "chronically overheat". Again, the proof of burden is in your court when you make such ridiculous statements. You have to provide solid evidence of your accusations or its nothing more than hearsay. Of course, I passively want you to attempt this so I can turn around and show you a plethora of evidence stating otherwise. I am hoping that continuously proving you wrong will be a way to keep me mildly entertained while at work. So try again.

You have proven absolutely nothing, and no matter how hard you try, and how many times you repeat the same thing over and over, you simply saying it does not prove anything. The burden of proof is in your court. So try again.

Brandon, Zodiac is a random troll, ignore him.
Brandon, Panic is a troll, ignore him.

I disagree.

/e Also, you also bare the "burden of proof." You can't just tell the opposing side that they have to provide proof to support their beliefs, while you yourself have provided none. That is retarded.

This post was edited by Panic_Fails_at_Diablo on Jul 11 2011 10:01am

You disagree with what?

Also, I did provide proof. Not that I actually had to provide any more proof since this thread is proof in of itself (since people are disagreeing with which brand is better than others), but I also showed a chart from a reputable laptop-oriented website that disagrees with GEZodiac's opinion that particular brands are exclusively better than other particular brands.

Jesus, kid...I don't know if you are lazy or stubborn or literally this dumb, but please learn to read what I type. My argument this entire time is simply that opinions vary greatly between which brand is the best/worst, and if you are going to say something as asinine as "X laptop brand sucks and my proof is that everyone who knows something about computers agrees with me", then you have to provide PROOF that "everyone who knows something about computers" do, in fact, agree with you.

I showed that this isn't the case, which is what my original premise was.

It literally terrifies me thinking that some of you are going to be in the workforce soon.

I disagree.

what you think of alienware m17x? my brother ended up picking that