Quote (Panic_Fails_at_Diablo @ Jun 10 2011 12:08am)
You obviously have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. I never said Halo 2/3 were bad games; quite the opposite in fact(More so for H2 than H3), I thoroughly enjoyed both games at both a competitive and casual level. This does not, however make them flawless games. Halo CE and 2 were the MLG flagships games because they were good, competitive games. Halo 3 and Reach were/are the flagships games simply because they were/are popular(Although Reach isn't even that popular), and because, at this point, MLG is known for being "Major League Halo." Anyone with any sense(This includes both random casual players and MLG pros) knew that H3 was an incredibly flawed game. It's the same thing for H2 - Everybody(Casual players and pros alike) knew that the AA and host advantage were pretty big problems.
You're basically the only person in the universe who has this opinion on Reach. Reach plays terribly, and anyone with any experience playing competitive Halo knows this. The game physics are absolutely terrible, the bloom mechanism is horribly flawed, the maps are badly constructed, grenades/rockets are flawed, AA's slow the pace of the game to a grinding halt, etc. I could go on and on about the flaws of Reach and how these flaws absolutely ruin the game. There is no "opinion" to be voiced here; Reach is a painfully uncompetitive game. The bloom mechanism alone causes this.
lol ur getting so mad
i gave an other option to why u are disputing the fact that halo 2 and 3 were amazing games. its that u take it seriously and i can tell that the flaws that u mention has personally gotten u to the point where u wana basically kill urself because u cant get kills or u keep dying becuz of these flaws
also, alot of those flaws u mentioned about halo reach are oppinions, they are not facts... and yes i know reach is uncompetitive, which is my main reason for not liking it
seems like ur arguement here is that halo 2 and 3 were not perfect.
my arguement is that halo reach shouve stayed faithful to how the halo games were played... which means, no bloom, the low geravity, no getting hurt when landing, more fast pace etc.
from what ur saying it seems like u agree with my arugment?
i dont no why ur arguing about the things i consider little flaws... if the flaws in halo 2 and 3 really bothered me that much i wouldnt have played em as much as i did
This post was edited by xMaxPower on Jun 9 2011 06:24pm