You obviously are if you think that turning off AA is even relevant to this discussion. You have to have SOME auto aim with H2; this isn't Goldeneye we're talking about.

lmao where did you copy and paste this from.. seeing that post count you have no time for video games..

I play Halo for like 18 hours a day random. That's why I'm ranked #1 on mlg.

ranked #1 mlg?
what is this..

You haven't heard of me? LOL fucking scrub.

the things u consider huge problems are ur oppinion...

theres a reason why halo 2 and 3 were the main game for mlg
and theres a reason why a lot of people left the halo series for cod

obviously these werent huge problems to many people except for u...
halo reach has barely any bugs yet people have left it for cod
halo 3 had a lot of little flaws yet a lot of people stayed faithful to the game

and no, my arguement is not that the games could have been good
my arguement is that halo reach didnt stay faithfull to the halo series, they brought all this extra shit that just isnt halo, this is why they lost so many fans

the game was perfect to me in terms of the way it is played.

this is my oppinion, personally i do not agree with ur oppinions...

im guesing its either.... u did not enjoy halo 2 or 3
or... u took halo 2 and 3 waaaaaaaayy to seriously and u were one of those kids that raged everytime u get out br'd

This post was edited by xMaxPower on Jun 9 2011 06:01pm

so halo is pretty much ur whole life lol
yah theres my proof of why u did not like halo 2 and 3

u prolly raged everytime u got beat down because of the "flawed beat down system"
or got sniped because of "auto aim"

i can imagine ur one of those kids that makes excuses everytime u die becuz u think ur the best in the world

You obviously have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. I never said Halo 2/3 were bad games; quite the opposite in fact(More so for H2 than H3), I thoroughly enjoyed both games at both a competitive and casual level. This does not, however make them flawless games. Halo CE and 2 were the MLG flagships games because they were good, competitive games. Halo 3 and Reach were/are the flagships games simply because they were/are popular(Although Reach isn't even that popular), and because, at this point, MLG is known for being "Major League Halo." Anyone with any sense(This includes both random casual players and MLG pros) knew that H3 was an incredibly flawed game. It's the same thing for H2 - Everybody(Casual players and pros alike) knew that the AA and host advantage were pretty big problems.




You're basically the only person in the universe who has this opinion on Reach. Reach plays terribly, and anyone with any experience playing competitive Halo knows this. The game physics are absolutely terrible, the bloom mechanism is horribly flawed, the maps are badly constructed, grenades/rockets are flawed, AA's slow the pace of the game to a grinding halt, etc. I could go on and on about the flaws of Reach and how these flaws absolutely ruin the game. There is no "opinion" to be voiced here; Reach is a painfully uncompetitive game. The bloom mechanism alone causes this.

I was obviously being facetious. If you think that H2's AA and H3's registration issues weren't real problems, any logical argument that I present will be lost because you don't know how to formulate an unbiased opinion.

Nope. Those are facts. If you ask anyone who was competitive in any halo they would list the exact same pros and cons for each and every game.=