Agreed and I've been here longer than anyone here (posting in halo series wise)

I'm pretty sure you'd get slapped in Halo Reach.

On the other note, Grumblee got owned ^^

http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=50019511&f=115&o=20

I actually liked Halo 1, I didn't like the campaign. I loved Halo 2, I didn't like the campaign, the glitches gave me an incentive to play it even more. I loved Halo 3, not as much as Halo 2 but I still freaking loved it.
Halo Reach sucks balls and I hate it.

I was actually talking on a game show and the topic was Evolution of games from Super Nintento to Sega Dreamcast to Ps1 to Gameboys and to todays consoles. It came to the point where we were asked what were our favorite games for the Xbox 360. Nothing came to mind, instead I decided to say I hated all of the games.
CoD, Reach, and Gears 2.
These games only gave me something to do. Everything I do I like to make it a competition, and these games didn't go through for me.
It wasn't because I couldn't adapt, but its because the game itself is complete shit.

You act as if every game put on the market is a good game, and that you just have to adapt to it. Doesn't work like that buddy.

This post was edited by RecenT on Nov 17 2010 12:58pm

LoL. I didn't read any of that but ok.

Oh cept for that last line. Whats wrong with Halo Reach. Truly wrong. Not some dumb shit opinion about Blooming reticles lol.
Blooming reticles add's an extra challenge. Must be why you hate it. You don't like challenges.

This post was edited by Kamel on Nov 17 2010 01:06pm

Why is it an extra challenge?
I can only assume that the radius of the bloom is a percentage on whether the bullet will hit your opponent or not. So why is it viable for some bad kid who is as good as me have his decreased percentage favor him over mine?

Lets say for example the full radius of the bloom is a 15% chance that the bullet will be in the middle and hit face.
Why is it 'challenging' that 15% will favor him over mine at one point in the game?

You suck. You should read the first line, it's the part where I say "I'm pretty sure you'd get slapped in Reach."

If I wanted to do the challenges, I'd do the daily and weekly challenges.

This post was edited by RecenT on Nov 17 2010 01:13pm

By the way, Halo Reach is a poor reenactment of Halo 3 or any of the series. I don't mind Halo 1 being like Halo 2 and Halo 3, or Halo 3 being similar to Halo 2 and Halo 1. Why not continue making the same game that works?
It's exactly what Nintendo has been doing for years, remaking all of their successful games.

What is Halo Reach? Some garbage shit in attempt to flush out money before they end their franchise.

i agree with this.
hell, look at mario rarely does it change what he does, they make spin offs of the game but still it rarely changes.
the best mario was super mario 64...

i fucking had that bought for my Wii was so fucking godly.
Along with Zelda. the story line is save Zelda, barely changed in the franchises history.
except for majora's mask

This post was edited by cdillon42 on Nov 17 2010 02:01pm

You are stupid. The bloom is there to prevent kids from just being able to hold the trigger down and hit someone with complete accuracy that is way down range from them. Its promoting people to actually take the time to aim at people. The DMR bloom is negligible at close ranges. The percent you speak of are hypothetical, cause I haven't seen any such data.

Obviously the bloom is signifying a loss of accuracy. Obviously your percent to hit someone decreases when its blooming. Obviously (not so obvious to you apparently) the challenge is that you have to time your shots accordingly.


I don't give a fuck if your Pro or w/e you think you are. You being pro has nothing with the fact that your crying over something that is subjective.

Your idea of just going along with something that works makes perfect sense. I'd love a world with no variety. Lets all just eat cheese pizza every fucking day. It works so why should we change it. In fact why did they even make any other games besides Mario. I mean Mario worked right. Every game should just follow the same formula as Mario so all games work good.

True sign of a underachiever.

No because it is simply a custom game option, it wont affect you in any way/shape/form. This is so that all the "mlg/tryhards" bungie.net kids whine about can have a GOOD mlg playlist and leave them alone, the way it should have been upon release.

You are the reason Halo gets dumbed down, go to the Bungie.net forums, that is where ignorant kids like you belong.
The Bloom adds randomness to the game, it is supposed to punish spammers and reward accurate paced shots, but everyone that has played reach knows they can get away with spamming shots, especially at close range.
As for your comment about change. IF IT AINT BROKE, DON'T FIX IT. You wanna know what I loved about Halo? When i shot a weapon, i knew exactly where the bullet was going to go. They managed to steal so much from CoD, but failed to capture the accuracy of their weapons. Sometimes change is bad.
Beatdowns. Even you can't possibly argue that it is fair when a player has the first 3 shots on someone (with a DMR) they both beat eachother down, and now they're on the same level playing field again.
Bungie holds your hand just like infinity ward did in MW2. You get shot first? Just beat them down. You can't aim? Grenades are OP. You can't spray your AR and beat skilled players? Don't worry, we nerfed their weapon.
You get caught out of position? Use armor lock. You can't get kills with the sniper? Hide and use camo.

I could go on for ever.

tl;dr GET OUT

Calm down, if you hate it that much go LAN Halo 2 lolol