If the ranking system in Reach was better, I would say it is more competitive than H3.

I prefer Halo 1's campaign over Halo 3's, but I like Halo 3's multiplayer the best.

agreed.

h2 didn't have any teamwork or aiming skill whatsoever.

this
E: halo3 is gg and always will be

This post was edited by marinesss on Oct 4 2010 04:41pm

Lol, no.

Reach is so much more competitive than Halo 3. CE and H2 were also easily better than than Halo 3.

Always comical when people stand up for, by far, the worst game in the series.

This post was edited by JayKwik on Oct 4 2010 05:44pm

LOL, NO

and your opinion matters why? i thought you said you were "leaving this shit hole and never coming back"?

halo 3 > reach atm.

Clearly retarded.
Reach is bounds beyond better than 3.
3 was a decent game at the end of its life once v8 was out. But, other than that the game sucked.

reach sux period even you admitted it the other day.
its only good with mlg customs so far and its basically impossible to get a party of 8 going.

if i said it was retarded i meant what we were playing.
MLG settings are on v1, obv need improvement which will be done overtime

at least halo 3 i can go into match making and not rage because of some stupid shit.
reach i can have the first 3 shots hit all of him and take my time for my 4th and 5th shot and the kid can still kill me with a lucky head shot by spamming the dmr.