d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Hearthstone > Reno Jackson
1238Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,041
Joined: Aug 21 2008
Gold: 227.00
Nov 14 2015 05:31pm
Is changing Hearthstone.

Late game they may have set you up for lethal next turn. Maybe a fireball or FoN + Savage Roar and their plan is ruined.
Aggro decks get punished by having to deal through another 20+ HP.
Long fatigue/control matches become drastically different towards the late game.

Now the issue is.. do we have enough cards worth dropping? I think the answer is yes for some - no for others.

Example: Control Warrior absolutely needs 2 Execute, 2 Shield Slam, 2 of the Axes etc. But do they really need 2 Sludge Belchers? 2 Shieldmaidens?

I think this card alone will encourage building decks with more variety and I believe we will soon hit the "wtf" meta where you never really know what someone is playing.
Member
Posts: 25,490
Joined: Dec 19 2009
Gold: 4,995.20
Nov 14 2015 05:53pm
someone with that card shut my freeze mage down yesterday t.t
Member
Posts: 26,095
Joined: Feb 26 2008
Gold: 9.00
Nov 14 2015 05:55pm
i'm happy at least that a single card from this expansion,can and will change the meta into more control decks.

also,i'm happy that decks like freeze mage/face hunter will be eliminated from ladder soon or ladder.so,props to blizzard for this.

also,i agree that warrior doesnt need double belchers/shieldmaidens etc.just put some executes/deaths bites/s.slams etc as u said and you are good to go.the potential +29hp,is insane.

/e. but still there are more cards like the legendary which double battlecries.

This post was edited by kalhmera on Nov 14 2015 05:57pm
Member
Posts: 41,780
Joined: Jan 13 2009
Gold: 25.20
Nov 14 2015 06:27pm
The more people that build Reno decks the more power control decks WITHOUT Reno will have
They're consistent and have more threats

This post was edited by FroggyG on Nov 14 2015 06:27pm
Member
Posts: 17,233
Joined: May 31 2007
Gold: 0.00
Nov 14 2015 07:05pm
I just love dropping it at 5-10 hp. B)
Member
Posts: 26,095
Joined: Feb 26 2008
Gold: 9.00
Nov 14 2015 07:08pm
Quote (FroggyG @ Nov 15 2015 12:27am)
The more people that build Reno decks the more power control decks WITHOUT Reno will have
They're consistent and have more threats


both decks have the same amount of threats,But the deck with reno has more options and has the +XX heal.

This post was edited by kalhmera on Nov 14 2015 07:08pm
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Nov 14 2015 11:36pm
I think it's a wonderful card for the meta because it encourages using generally rarely used cards which makes the games more interesting and varied. And it's really strong.
Member
Posts: 69,088
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 134,207.00
Nov 15 2015 03:33am
Quote (FroggyG @ Nov 15 2015 12:27am)
The more people that build Reno decks the more power control decks WITHOUT Reno will have
They're consistent and have more threats


u tend to argue everything
here and on league

Member
Posts: 26,095
Joined: Feb 26 2008
Gold: 9.00
Nov 15 2015 08:39am
seems like 30 single cards is the way to go with jackson.you have to be sure 100% no matter what,that you will take the +XX hp.

i use double SSlam,execute,deathsbite,war axe,armorsmith and i just lost the value from jackson because i had 1 armorsmith still in my deck.

so,by replacing these 5 cards,you can have 5 more threats on board which isnt bad at all.

its hard decision


This post was edited by kalhmera on Nov 15 2015 08:53am
Member
Posts: 36,389
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 3,192.00
Nov 15 2015 08:54am
How does standard fatigue warrior do against Reno decks? I'd imagine pretty well.

Quote (kalhmera @ Nov 15 2015 09:39am)
seems like 30 single cards is the way to go with jackson.you have to be sure 100% no matter what,that you will take the +XX hp.

i use double SSlam,execute,deathsbite,war axe,armorsmith and i just lost the value from jackson because i had 1 armorsmith still in my deck.

so,by replacing these 5 cards,you can have 5 more threats on board which isnt bad at all.

its hard decision


I disagree. I think playing with optimal 2-of's is worth the risk if the chance is low. You can't expect to win every game

This post was edited by Mastersam93 on Nov 15 2015 08:56am
Go Back To Hearthstone Topic List
1238Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll