Wow I forgot that nerf even happened. Guess my point is kind of moot then

Though I don't think flare would've been played if it didn't also get rid of secrets

This post was edited by Voyaging on Jul 15 2015 06:17am

Dude u notice that now :D??

wheres whiskers?we need his advice to solve the situation.

i dont under stand how spending 3 mana for 1 card makes any sense

they probly over pay for everything in real life

woo a candy bar for 6.66 wow what a deal

I'm actually laughing at everyone posting in this senseless thread

myself included

AI confirmed terrible card, that's why it's not run in any single mage deck, definitely not in any tempo mage decks, and of course not in any freeze mage decks.

Seems like a pretty insightful discussion tbh since there are two very opposed opinions with legend players on both sides of the argument

Nobody is saying it's a bad card in every deck (well op is but he's a confirmed moron). I'm saying the card draw function of the card in isolation is fairly mediocre, even bad.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Jul 15 2015 10:34am

woah bro we onthe same side

i tell u like the other guy u going to be rude dont post in my threads

You're either a troll or kind of dumb ^-^
Or maybe you don't understand what deck thinning is oO;

Using freeze mage as an example, you need a certain combo of cards ( Emperor / Ice Lance / Ice Lance / Frost Bolt / Malygoss ) so you thing your deck by adding nothing but draw cards - that's what deck thinning is. When you stack draw cards, like in freeze mage, it's deck thinning to increase the chances of drawing your full combo so every other card in the deck is about stall / draw. 2 Loot Hoarder, 2 Acolyte, 2 intellect. The largest benefit of mad scientist is the deck thinning.