d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Hearthstone > Hearthstone General Discussion
Prev15075085095105111090Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 23,312
Joined: Apr 18 2008
Gold: 45,199.50
May 27 2016 09:48am
Quote (Demand @ May 26 2016 05:29pm)
Well it's been a month since the release of Whispers of the Old Gods, saved up like 5300 gold and spent it on packs + the 13 free packs and have been using all my daily quest gold on packs... so far have only opened 2 Mukla, Tyrant of the Vales for legendaries FeelsBadMan

At least with the nerfed cards and the dust I had saved I had enough for Ragnaros Lightlord, Malkorok, Twin Emperor, N'Zoth and Yogg. Guess I'll craft Fandral next



I cant be the only one who thinks malkorok is realllllllly bad right? Just run a gorehowl, and weapon problem is solved.. Not sure off the top how many weapons are currently in standard, but playing malkorok is like a 1:10 auto loss? Sounds reallly good man.

Pretty 'average' pack opening tbh. Thanks for sharing.

This post was edited by Hepzibah on May 27 2016 09:57am
Member
Posts: 3,061
Joined: Aug 19 2013
Gold: Locked
Warn: 10%
May 27 2016 11:31am
Quote (Hepzibah @ May 27 2016 11:48am)
I cant be the only one who thinks malkorok is realllllllly bad right? Just run a gorehowl, and weapon problem is solved.. Not sure off the top how many weapons are currently in standard, but playing malkorok is like a 1:10 auto loss? Sounds reallly good man.

Pretty 'average' pack opening tbh. Thanks for sharing.


a body + a weapon shouldnt = a loss even if behind.
i wouldnt necessarily run him, but ooze or harrison is auto play on gorehowl, and at least one should be ran in every deck anyways to combat the shaman aggro netdeck crap that you face 70% of the time.
i dont think hes that bad of a card and would probably run him in control war along with a gorehowl.
and a post from another forum

Quote
So of the 26 weapons in game 5 are bad, 12 are good, 6 are great, and 3 amazing to put that in percentages 19% are bad 46% are good 23% and great and 11% are amazing.
80% of the time youll get something of value or better and 34% of the time youll get something exceeding the value of the card.
Member
Posts: 31,978
Joined: Jul 2 2006
Gold: 35,655.00
May 27 2016 12:21pm
Quote (DiabloDarkness @ 27 May 2016 12:31)
a body + a weapon shouldnt = a loss even if behind.
i wouldnt necessarily run him, but ooze or harrison is auto play on gorehowl, and at least one should be ran in every deck anyways to combat the shaman aggro netdeck crap that you face 70% of the time.
i dont think hes that bad of a card and would probably run him in control war along with a gorehowl.
and a post from another forum


the 1/10 loss is when you get cursed blade.

Having a 7 mana 6/5 is better than this in most cases.

Obviously if it wasn't for that card it'd be so much better.
Member
Posts: 73,125
Joined: Nov 1 2006
Gold: 36,615.00
May 27 2016 01:04pm
a body + a weapon is better than a slow weapon in a tempo oriented deck
now if we are talking about control warrior, gorehowl is probably better
Member
Posts: 23,312
Joined: Apr 18 2008
Gold: 45,199.50
May 27 2016 01:19pm
Quote (Troll @ May 27 2016 02:04pm)
a body + a weapon is better than a slow weapon in a tempo oriented deck
now if we are talking about control warrior, gorehowl is probably better


I'm almost positive people are dropping malkorok in favor of more charge minions in competitive scene atm.. charge synergy is better with varian, which most decks are running... -- Rafaam warrior is kind of a joke imo.

tempo warrior in general is kind of a joke to me.. it basically runs like patron warrior- without the explosive patron turns and a more 4head residentsleeper gameplan. Might as well go full cw at this point.. You ever seen what a board of patrons does to the tempo warrior deck? its usually just game over.

Quote (DiabloDarkness @ May 27 2016 12:31pm)
a body + a weapon shouldnt = a loss even if behind.
i wouldnt necessarily run him, but ooze or harrison is auto play on gorehowl, and at least one should be ran in every deck anyways to combat the shaman aggro netdeck crap that you face 70% of the time.
i dont think hes that bad of a card and would probably run him in control war along with a gorehowl.
and a post from another forum


Not every deck has space for the weapon removal. if it doesn't play into your gameplan.. it just doesn't work.
The outcome is too random to take seriously, and I think people are starting to realize it now.. slowly, but its happening. -- at least when considering the card for 'tempo warrior'.. it definitely makes more sense in a control warrior deck to me.

This post was edited by Hepzibah on May 27 2016 01:23pm
Member
Posts: 97,837
Joined: Feb 26 2006
Gold: 3.09
Trader: Trusted
May 27 2016 01:39pm
Anyone have good warrior decks? I've never really played it since old control (before Gnomes/Goblins way way back)

Looking for control or C'thun
Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Jan 7 2016
Gold: 0.00
May 27 2016 02:05pm
Quote (Garnier @ May 27 2016 08:39pm)
Anyone have good warrior decks? I've never really played it since old control (before Gnomes/Goblins way way back)

Looking for control or C'thun


Control C'thun it is !

This post was edited by Snikjj on May 27 2016 02:05pm
Member
Posts: 3,061
Joined: Aug 19 2013
Gold: Locked
Warn: 10%
May 27 2016 02:39pm
Quote (Garnier @ May 27 2016 03:39pm)
Anyone have good warrior decks? I've never really played it since old control (before Gnomes/Goblins way way back)

Looking for control or C'thun


sorry out of order trying to make from memory

cthun cards-
2x disciple
1x chosen (maybe 2)
1x elder (maybe 2)
2x the 10 armor guy
1x doomcaller
1x twin emperor
1x cthun

neutral-
1x brann
2x acolyte of pain
1x elise (or not)
1x justicular
1x sylvanas

warrior-
2x brawl
2x execute
2x shield slam
1x gorehowl
2x war axe
shield block------- |--------
slam---------------- | 1 or 2 of all these
ravaging ghoul ---|
blood to ichor------|------
Member
Posts: 3,061
Joined: Aug 19 2013
Gold: Locked
Warn: 10%
May 27 2016 07:51pm
currently 4-0 but prob finish like 5-3 lol

http://i.imgur.com/R4zVatv.jpg
Member
Posts: 35,925
Joined: Jun 4 2008
Gold: 2,337.00
May 27 2016 07:58pm
Quote (DiabloDarkness @ May 27 2016 06:51pm)
currently 4-0 but prob finish like 5-3 lol

http://i.imgur.com/R4zVatv.jpg


6-0
Go Back To Hearthstone Topic List
Prev15075085095105111090Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll