The deck being shitty is a given. But is he totally unable to win with this shitty deck?



Guess not. The question is why is he winning with this shitty deck. You're free to your opinion, but I'm going to say some key cards have a lot to do with it.

This post was edited by jspBryan on Jun 7 2015 04:34am

You are an idiot. Of course taking out key cards can make a deck worse. He was obviously referring to drboom and bgh and the legendary cards. You can't just slap these into a shitty deck and win.



Yeah, there's 0 chance this deck actually does good against those 2 decks. It simply does not have the early game to do so.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on Jun 7 2015 07:32am

Quote (DrLatBC @ Jun 5 2015 03:15pm)

3 cards can not make any deck good or "give it a chance to win". You are wrong.

explain. are u saying every card is what a deck is built around?
Because i see a lot of decks built around 2 cards and actually are the most powerful decks.
You seem to talk a lot about decks you've never tried/played and just assume its bad based on its cards
Kind of like how people viewed many of the cards of GvG before it came out.
Its cardstone

your opinion seems to be replace dr boom with war golem and the deck's winrate shouldnt be affected however most wins come from boom bot rng

No. My opinion, again, is putting dr boom into a shitty deck doesn't suddenly make that deck not shitty. I have said this over and over. The point was not key class cards can't make any deck good, because they can not go in ANY deck. He said cards like drboom, bgh, sylvanas, then we some how jumped to fiery war axe and frothing? Read into subtext, read the first post i responded to on this.



The original 3 cards we were actually talking about before your nonsense.



This post was edited by DrLatBC on Jun 7 2015 06:29pm

First off just because dr.boom is common there is not 1 deck in this game built around dr.boom is 100% support card.. It takes 1 turn for it to work.. Most legendary that built around win are games that have instant effect.. Such as Alex, Grom, Rag, ETC .. 2 class epics > Dr.boom in any situation.. If u have 1600 and zero cards making 2 epics is better, making 4 rares or 8 uncommons most of time could be better.. Salv is only a control card.. Its very rarely played in agro at all.


DrLat is 100% correct all you idiots that only build decks off first page stfu.. Onlypeople that theroy craft understand...

Dr.Boom Is amazing support card stand alone its subpar.

this has been one of my favorite decks to play

so many different and fun combos to do

That would be quite a claim for someone to make. But you have to agree Dr. Balance does make a shitty deck better. There's just no argument against that because he's an overpowered card. Does he make it so much better that it's good? By himself, no. With a few more similarly powerful cards, the strength is noticeable. It's not that they will elevate a shitty deck to being as consistent as someone like Kolento's deck, but I think they will have a chance to beat better decks because sometimes the other guy will not also draw his overpowered cards.



It's not that it does good against them because what is doing good? Doing good in Hearthstone is not winning, it's winning consistently. How shitty the deck is is actually the whole point. This deck is SO shitty. It doesn't even have Fireballs! The question is why does it not always lose to them. That's what I'm interested in.

This post was edited by jspBryan on Jun 7 2015 11:56pm

Your opponent doesn't get a fast enough start to punish this ridiculously bad deck. This deck won't have a problem if it csn maintain board control, once you lose the board to minions that can't be flamestriked to death though gg. It has very little to do with the legs, more likely op is just rank 20ish.