it's not hard math lol. maybe it is for you, but that doesn't really mean anything. it's a rudimentary probability problem.

And yet you can not post the rudimentary math. Funny how that works, huh?

because i would have to literally type every single step for you to even have a chance to understand.

i gave you the tl;dr already: the chances are very low.

Rudimentary math has a lot of steps to it? Huh, imagine that.


Ps. The probability of it has nothing to do with it. Insta win conditions are stupid, blizzard hasn't included any what so ever.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on Mar 29 2015 01:01pm

I guess the first card is balanced in the way that almost always it will just be a shit card that you will have no reason to play
but when you do actually get to play it, its literally "auto win". Anyway, imo this card would not be any good, 99,99% it will sucks
and be very boring, and 0,01% of the time it will be fun and op.

The second one is a bit intresting though. But for yourself it would only be nice for the next turn, because then you put all your
dragons out and then you wont have anymore dragons on your hand, so any turns after the second turn where you have put your
free dragons out (counting that this dragon is still alive) would be like non-favor to you. Since in most cases all your other dragons (in hand)
would be put on the table right the turn after your big dragon. If you get my point.
Anyway I guess if we would put this concept on a board then either you would winn pretty quickly (because of all dragongs on table) or start
trading so this dragon would die so you start drawing cards again.

But would it not be better balanced if it gave you the ability to play one dragon for free each turn instead of all dragons at the same time?
Then you also have to consider if one zero-mana-cost dragon from your hand every turn or draw a card every turn is most valuable.
For example, you play this mega dragon of yours and you have 4 other dragons on your hand. Then you have to decide if you want
to keep this mega dragon for 4 turnns so you can play all yours dragons over 4 turns or start to trade it away so you can start drawing cards quicker.

This all counted without an enemy player attacking your dragon of course since we do not know if he wants or can attack it.
Sorry if my english isnt the best also, but hopefully you understand what I mean.

This post was edited by Litttle_Brother on Mar 29 2015 07:22pm

JW did u ever play MTG? Half the packs you open have useless or close to useless rares/unc/com cards. The other half had situational rares (+1 att all vampires etc.), only very rarely did you ever get a useful rare.

I get that they dont have the same stringent pack composition MTG has in HS but i still think the collectors aspect still exists for some people that transcends just deck use. One day when they finally get smart and allow trading this will be proven ten fold.

They won't ever allow trading, so don't hold your breath. If they allowed trading, this game would no longer be free.

new card ideas:

spell: swap your hand with your opponent's

Nah think would be too OP.

there should be a very specific condition with high mana costs to balance it