d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Hearthstone >
Service
> Which Decks Are You Using This Meta ? > Lets See What Everyone Is Liking
Prev1234510Next
Closed New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
Feb 2 2016 04:39pm
Quote (kalhmera @ Feb 2 2016 05:36pm)
frost giant "otk" warrior is quite good.


Quote (Troll @ Feb 2 2016 05:36pm)
frost giant + charge (+ double manipulator)


Oh.

So all you need is 10 hero powers + charge and faceless x 2 in your hand while you drop emp.

Why not just go with like any combo druid ever? lol

Fewer cards easier to do and more reliable.
Member
Posts: 36,389
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 3,192.00
Feb 2 2016 04:39pm
Quote (kalhmera @ Feb 2 2016 05:36pm)
frost giant "otk" warrior is quite good.


Its harder than it looks too.

/e And just Frost Giant + Charge + Faceless is 20 damage and 8 mana or less without Emperor.

This post was edited by Mastersam93 on Feb 2 2016 04:40pm
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
Feb 2 2016 04:42pm
Quote (Mastersam93 @ Feb 2 2016 05:39pm)
Its harder than it looks too.

/e And just Frost Giant + Charge + Faceless is 20 damage and 8 mana or less without Emperor.


8 mana but will probably never be played on turn 8 because you need 10 hero powers. Lol
Member
Posts: 73,113
Joined: Nov 1 2006
Gold: 36,615.00
Feb 2 2016 04:43pm
Quote (DrLatBC @ Feb 2 2016 11:39pm)
Oh.

So all you need is 10 hero powers + charge and faceless x 2 in your hand while you drop emp.

Why not just go with like any combo druid ever? lol

Fewer cards easier to do and more reliable.


dont know, never played the deck
since it's basically a control warrior, it's probably not that hard to draw atleast 80% of your deck
and ofc you'll armor 10 times if you play warrior... lol
i dont really know why he plays mountain giant tho, geddon would probably be way better

/e also, you dont need the full combo
faceless + giant + charge already does 20 damages and is way less predictable than a druid's combo

This post was edited by Troll on Feb 2 2016 04:45pm
Member
Posts: 36,389
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 3,192.00
Feb 2 2016 04:45pm
Quote (DrLatBC @ Feb 2 2016 05:42pm)
8 mana but will probably never be played on turn 8 because you need 10 hero powers. Lol


Well it's control warrior. You expect the game to go well past turn 8.
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
Feb 2 2016 04:46pm
Quote (Troll @ Feb 2 2016 05:43pm)
dont know, never played the deck
since it's basically a control warrior, it's probably not that hard to draw atleast 80% of your deck
and ofc you'll armor 10 times if you play warrior... lol
i dont really know why he plays mountain giant tho, geddon would probably be way better


My point is your adding a LOT of conditions to your win condition.

Only to piece together a combo that's probably worse than FoN + Savage roar lel.

Plus you're trying to piece together a 4 card combo in a deck that literally has 0 card cycle or draw.

Just meh imo. I'd rather use grom + cruel if i wanted a finisher that badly lol.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on Feb 2 2016 04:48pm
Member
Posts: 36,389
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 3,192.00
Feb 2 2016 04:51pm
Quote (DrLatBC @ Feb 2 2016 05:46pm)
My point is your adding a LOT of conditions to your win condition.

Only to piece together a combo that's probably worse than FoN + Savage roar lel.

Plus you're trying to piece together a 4 card combo in a deck that literally has 0 card cycle or draw.

Just meh imo. I'd rather use grom + cruel if i wanted a finisher that badly lol.


The OTK combo is not your win condition. It's just an option. And it has 2 acolytes, 2 shield blocks, and draws many cards naturally because games last a while.

Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
Feb 2 2016 04:52pm
Quote (Mastersam93 @ Feb 2 2016 05:51pm)
The OTK combo is not your win condition. It's just an option. And it has 2 acolytes, 2 shield blocks, and draws many cards naturally because games last a while.


Did.....
Did you look at the deck?
It doesn't have acolytes or shield blocks.....


And it the otk combo isn't your win condition your win conditions are .... what?

Fatigue?

Dropping ysera?

......

This post was edited by DrLatBC on Feb 2 2016 04:53pm
Member
Posts: 73,113
Joined: Nov 1 2006
Gold: 36,615.00
Feb 2 2016 04:53pm
Quote (DrLatBC @ Feb 2 2016 11:46pm)
My point is your adding a LOT of conditions to your win condition.

Only to piece together a combo that's probably worse than FoN + Savage roar lel.

Plus you're trying to piece together a 4 card combo in a deck that literally has 0 card cycle or draw.

Just meh imo. I'd rather use grom + cruel if i wanted a finisher that badly lol.


it's way more predictable
your opponent will always try to play around grom and won't go lower than 10-12 hp if he can
he will not play around a 20 damage combo that requires 3 card (well, now he could try since the deck has some success)
Member
Posts: 36,389
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 3,192.00
Feb 2 2016 04:56pm
Quote (DrLatBC @ Feb 2 2016 05:52pm)
Did.....
Did you look at the deck?
It doesn't have acolytes or shield blocks.....


And it the otk combo isn't your win condition your win conditions are .... what?

Fatigue?

Dropping ysera?

......


Then he's using a different decklist than most Frost Giant OTK decks
Go Back To Hearthstone Topic List
Prev1234510Next
Closed New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll