The thing is my current deck is already pretty packed when it comes to late game.

I don't think I can afford to remove an Armorsmith.

Here is the list

I've played 20 games as warrior on the ladder so far from rank 16 to 10, and have yet to play a single warrior, patron or otherwise. Have gone 15-5, with only a single one of those losses coming from a paladin, the only weapon class I've even faced, which I am 3-1 vs without Harrison.

6 Druid
7 mage
2 priest
4 paladin
1 warlock

0 Hunter
0 warrior
0 shaman
0 rogue

I know it's only a sample size of 20 games, but 4 of the weapon classes I have not even faced once in 20 games over the span of 7 different ranks.

Please tell me again why I should be trying to counter patron or other weapon classes?

This post was edited by x]FoRsaKeN[x on Sep 1 2015 05:29pm

I'd drop the whirlwind. I'm also not a fan of emperor in cw as I don't see tooooo much value out of it.

Whirlwind can be extremely useful though.

I wish decks could carry 35 cards.

I guess I prefer to be more greedy because i am confident managing the early game based on past experience and the state of the current meta.

My deck is
-1 whirlwind
-2 armorsmith

+geddon
+rag
+justicar.

Maybe try removing one armorsmith and replacing ww with revenge? That gives you one slot and you still have help early game

This post was edited by x]FoRsaKeN[x on Sep 1 2015 05:37pm

Well I was watching a legend stream and it was patron 2/3 of the time.
But I guess if you aren't facing them right now then whatever.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Sep 1 2015 05:39pm