d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Hearthstone > Hand Mage!!
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 25,493
Joined: Dec 19 2009
Gold: 5,795.20
Jun 4 2015 12:33pm
It's funny because I've been beating Face Hunters / Zoo / Demonlocks pretty easily
Member
Posts: 26,095
Joined: Feb 26 2008
Gold: 9.00
Jun 4 2015 12:46pm
i like your deck,dont make me wrong.am just saying thats is hard to stand up against aggro because the lack of cards like sayers,frost nova,frostbolts etc.

seems funny deck anyways and if you having fun with it,then everything is ok.
Member
Posts: 25,493
Joined: Dec 19 2009
Gold: 5,795.20
Jun 4 2015 12:55pm
Yeah I'm having loads of fun with it :D

I just fatigued a zoo lock that couldn't even proc my first ice block..

I might put in Frostbolts, but was never a fan of the doomsayer/frost nova combo
Member
Posts: 21,581
Joined: Jun 27 2009
Gold: 1.57
Jun 4 2015 01:27pm
Quote (Annor @ Jun 4 2015 11:33am)
It's funny because I've been beating Face Hunters / Zoo / Demonlocks pretty easily

that can't be possible; according to people in this thread the deck is not viable at all :wacko:
Member
Posts: 756
Joined: Jun 13 2012
Gold: 0.00
Jun 4 2015 03:34pm
Quote (Depdep @ Jun 4 2015 12:27pm)
that can't be possible; according to people in this thread the deck is not viable at all :wacko:


A deck with Boom/Big Game/Sylvanas/cards like that always has a chance to win. The question is whether it's optimized. I just think this deck would be way better with a sunfury and argus at least.
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
Jun 4 2015 09:23pm
Quote (jspBryan @ Jun 4 2015 04:34pm)
A deck with Boom/Big Game/Sylvanas/cards like that always has a chance to win. The question is whether it's optimized. I just think this deck would be way better with a sunfury and argus at least.


Highlighted part is wrong.

And yes if you really want to use this cheesy deck sunfury and argus would make it better. Echo giant mage is much better.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on Jun 4 2015 09:23pm
Member
Posts: 756
Joined: Jun 13 2012
Gold: 0.00
Jun 5 2015 02:42pm
Quote (DrLatBC @ Jun 4 2015 08:23pm)
Highlighted part is wrong.


Unless you think you can have a 100 percent win rate against people who drop Dr. Balanced and Big Game your own, I don't see how it's wrong.
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
Jun 5 2015 04:15pm
Quote (jspBryan @ Jun 5 2015 03:42pm)
Unless you think you can have a 100 percent win rate against people who drop Dr. Balanced and Big Game your own, I don't see how it's wrong.


3 cards can not make any deck good or "give it a chance to win". You are wrong.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on Jun 5 2015 04:16pm
Member
Posts: 21,581
Joined: Jun 27 2009
Gold: 1.57
Jun 5 2015 08:33pm
Quote (DrLatBC @ Jun 5 2015 03:15pm)
3 cards can not make any deck good or "give it a chance to win". You are wrong.

flamewaker/10
Member
Posts: 20,715
Joined: Mar 1 2008
Gold: 82.00
Jun 6 2015 12:06am
slowest deck in history? terrible curve, must have the worst win% against aggro...
Go Back To Hearthstone Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll