new players usually can't afford more than one deck

We both know it's not only new players complaining about face hunter.

sure, but he's new
he doesent even have brm iirc (only first wing)

Well now he knows how to beat them. Complaining doesn't solve shit.

A lot of people that complain about face hunter aren't complaining because they consistently lose to it.

A lot of complaining in games is more relevant to the game as a whole: The game's health and the overall enjoyment while playing it.
Face hunter lowers the standard of the game and is not enjoyable to have in your match.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Aug 20 2015 11:08am

I find that aggro adds a much needed twist to the meta. It does nothing to lower the standard of the game. You just enjoy control more than aggro, so that's what you want the meta to be. When greedy control is rampant, aggro keeps it in check. A necessary evil.

27 damage turn 4

suck it patron warriors

Patrons don't need their frothing to live one turn.

dat rank 20 is hilarious...

Aggro is perfectly fine. But mindlessly playing things with charge and hitting face is just poor gameplay.
Don't misunderstand me, I think Zoo and such are great.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Aug 20 2015 11:21am