I do, and most of it is retarded which suggests they are sub rank 15, which is worse than my fiancé who hasn't bought a single pack

It is likely that the person who is legend has more knowledge of the game, but that does not mean that person's post is right and the other person's is wrong.

Status does not determine who is right and who is wrong.



Prove them wrong or nothing you say would matter either.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Jul 18 2015 02:38pm

It does determine who is more LIKELY to be right or wrong, by an astronomical margin
You're basically trying to defend being bad at the game and claiming that people who are bad know what's going on, when they seriously don't

This post was edited by x]FoRsaKeN[x on Jul 18 2015 02:39pm

Likelihood doesn't determine who is right and who is wrong.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Jul 18 2015 02:39pm

You can't prove people wrong who didn't understand elementary reasoning and basic card game mechanics and strategy

I'm defending logic. You are bringing rank into a discussion where it is not relevant. It's a fallacy.

you can tell who is ranked high by their post. When i read this thread i know which ones are low ranked by the way they talk about the game.

wtf is going on here....lol

Did u just take your first high school logic course or something? If you think rank is irrelevant in terms of the validity and soundness of one'sargument pertaining directly to the strategy and nuances of the game, then I'm gonna have to choose my favorite ad hominem and call you a moron

So if a new born baby says 5x5 is 25 and a 50 year experience mathematician says 5x5 is 24, does that mean 5x5 is 24? No point in even looking into it, right, because the mathematician has a higher status?



You can assume.
Doesn't mean you're right at all.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Jul 18 2015 02:48pm