Quote (Quietscheente @ Jan 16 2017 01:25pm)
Hey guys, Craig from Winnipeg here on Dan's computer.
As we say around discussing our hopes and plans for the future, I realized something very special.
In a game of HOTS that our boy Sneakiiii on twitch was hosting, we started to think about how the banning phase in HOTS takes too long, it makes the game take longer and thus takes away the fun of playing the game.
As I poured Chase from Baytown Texas, currently in Dallas as he finishes his schooling to become a programmer, another drink. Chase made the comment, "its the problem hearthstone doesn't have"
Bam, like a video game christmas new year miracle it hit us.
BANNING IN HEARTHSTONE would fix meta.
During the pick phase add 15 seconds, to chose 3 cards you want banned from the opponents deck.
They can be any cards, neutrals included. There is no for sure here, you might pick 3 cards not in his deck at all. Or you might ban Fiery War Axe and remove 2.
In some cases you could remove 6 cards total, and nerf a deck.
This alone would create so many more decks, and force the net deck to be weakened.
Please let me know what you all think....
Craig P.
And always remember what Luke Smith also said.
A dream written down with a date becomes a goal. A goal broken down into steps becomes a plan. A plan backed by action makes your dreams come true. – Luke Smith.
Lets make Hearthstone better, together in 2017!
Its funny how your mate chase recognizes the banning phase to be a 'problem hearthstone doesnt have'
Yet you'd like to add the problem to hearthstone.
Lmao... Pour yourselves some more drinks m8s