d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Hearthstone > Freeze Mage Theorycrafting
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 41,780
Joined: Jan 13 2009
Gold: 25.20
Dec 17 2015 01:31pm
Quote (Hepzibah @ Dec 17 2015 11:09am)
I think this list is bad. Explosive sheep and double flamestrike is silly.


Quote (Megamanexe @ Dec 17 2015 11:29am)
SHEEP IS VERY GOOD
But 2 flamestrike
idk about that


What about a suggestion of what he should do instead?

Constructive criticism instead of just criticism.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Dec 17 2015 01:31pm
Member
Posts: 69,106
Joined: Apr 23 2008
Gold: 134,087.00
Dec 17 2015 01:37pm
Quote (FroggyG @ Dec 17 2015 07:31pm)
What about a suggestion of what he should do instead?

Constructive criticism instead of just criticism.


i said idk
And i added my input
calm down froggy
Member
Posts: 26,095
Joined: Feb 26 2008
Gold: 9.00
Dec 17 2015 03:13pm
Quote (Hepzibah @ Dec 17 2015 07:09pm)
I think this list is bad. Explosive sheep and double flamestrike is silly.


sheep is the best you can use vs aggro decks.how you think is silly?also double something=more chances to draw it...so!

plus i dont think i need something else...

This post was edited by kalhmera on Dec 17 2015 03:13pm
Member
Posts: 23,312
Joined: Apr 18 2008
Gold: 45,199.50
Dec 17 2015 03:15pm
Quote (FroggyG @ Dec 17 2015 02:31pm)
What about a suggestion of what he should do instead?

Constructive criticism instead of just criticism.


So many people lacking common sense on here.. :3
Generally to have a successful ladder deck you need consistency, and a good curve.
and so I'd run a second acolyte over the second flamestrike.
I prefer Cone of cold over sheep but that's just a style//meta call.

I'm just stating what I feel/know is kind of bad in this deck... Ultimately the op can choose what cards he would like to run.

Quote (kalhmera @ Dec 17 2015 04:13pm)
sheep is the best you can use vs aggro decks.how you think is silly?also double something=more chances to draw it...so!

plus i dont think i need something else...


Except for the fact that you cut card draw in favor of a late game clear.. In a good game you won't even need to flamestrike before you've found lethal. -- in a bad game you'll have double flamestrike in your opening hand.. :/
I don't think youre very good at freezemage m8. :P
e/

also cutting a fireball is horrible.

This post was edited by Hepzibah on Dec 17 2015 03:18pm
Member
Posts: 41,780
Joined: Jan 13 2009
Gold: 25.20
Dec 17 2015 03:38pm
Quote (Hepzibah @ Dec 17 2015 01:15pm)
So many people lacking common sense on here.. :3
Generally to have a successful ladder deck you need consistency, and a good curve.
and so I'd run a second acolyte over the second flamestrike.
I prefer Cone of cold over sheep but that's just a style//meta call.

I'm just stating what I feel/know is kind of bad in this deck... Ultimately the op can choose what cards he would like to run.


Yeah but if all you do is state an opinion with no reason with it, your opinion is ultimately useless and so is the post.
Better to not make the post at all.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Dec 17 2015 03:39pm
Member
Posts: 23,312
Joined: Apr 18 2008
Gold: 45,199.50
Dec 17 2015 03:51pm
Quote (FroggyG @ Dec 17 2015 04:38pm)
Yeah but if all you do is state an opinion with no reason with it, your opinion is ultimately useless and so is the post.
Better to not make the post at all.


I think you need to read this thread over again froggy.. You may have missed the part where I was giving my opinion, and reasons for it.
Oh, while on the subject, wtf are you doing in here again?

This post was edited by Hepzibah on Dec 17 2015 03:51pm
Member
Posts: 41,780
Joined: Jan 13 2009
Gold: 25.20
Dec 17 2015 03:52pm
Quote (Hepzibah @ Dec 17 2015 01:51pm)
I think you need to read this thread over again froggy.. You may have missed the part where I was giving my opinion, and reasons for it.
Oh, while on the subject, wtf are you doing in here again?


I'm stating an overall point for discussion, based on the 2 posts I quoted which were exactly as I described.

You don't need to immediately jump to defend yourself.
It's ok to just have a conversation.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Dec 17 2015 03:53pm
Member
Posts: 23,312
Joined: Apr 18 2008
Gold: 45,199.50
Dec 17 2015 03:53pm
Quote (FroggyG @ Dec 17 2015 04:52pm)
I'm stating an overall point for discussion.
You don't need to immediately jump to defend yourself.


Actually when youre attacking me and my post, I have two options... Defend my reasoning, or ignore your doucheass.
I should have chosen second option. :/

Quote (FroggyG @ Dec 17 2015 02:31pm)
What about a suggestion of what he should do instead?

Constructive criticism instead of just criticism.


Refer to page 1 m8.



This post was edited by Hepzibah on Dec 17 2015 03:54pm
Member
Posts: 41,780
Joined: Jan 13 2009
Gold: 25.20
Dec 17 2015 03:57pm
Quote (Hepzibah @ Dec 17 2015 01:53pm)
Actually when youre attacking me and my post, I have two options... Defend my reasoning, or ignore your doucheass.
I should have chosen second option. :/
Refer to page 1 m8.


You're too sensitive. Just wanted a conversation about constructive posts.
Member
Posts: 23,312
Joined: Apr 18 2008
Gold: 45,199.50
Dec 17 2015 04:00pm
Quote (FroggyG @ Dec 17 2015 04:57pm)
You're too sensitive. Just wanted a conversation about constructive posts.


Then go post in general chat m8.
Go Back To Hearthstone Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll