There's also the fact that every deck in the game that loses to Patron had tech for Patron.

You say some of the stupidest and most inaccurate things in this entire forum.

"Patron Warrior has been the meta-defining deck of Blackrock Mountain. Every deck and lineup is forced to tech against it."

Literally from the link this thread is referring to.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Sep 9 2015 12:12pm

Just because it's in the thread and I linked the thread doesn't mean everything in there is fact or that I agree with it bro

And if you don't agree with it then it must be stupid and inaccurate, right?
Clearly Patron has a low win rate simply because it's a shit deck right?

Clearly if 1 deck has a higher win rate it's a better deck overall, right? Not that the deck might be customized for a specific match up because it's a meta defining deck.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Sep 9 2015 12:17pm

i just realized that you're Canadian. I'm no longer dumbfounded as to why you act the way you do.

Go pet a moose

^^

that's just variance

these stats are not from ladder and therefore are meaningless to ladder

This post was edited by Airwaves on Sep 9 2015 12:46pm

To be fair most pros suck with patron warrior too.

I think if we made an engine that playing near optimal HS it would be most dominant with Patron.

Thanks for the link.

interesting read.