d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Hearthstone >
Service
> The Real Dragon Deck - Paladin
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 21,581
Joined: Jun 27 2009
Gold: 1.57
May 3 2015 03:13am
i cant read it because its not in english so i can't really give my opinon




Kappa
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
May 3 2015 03:22am
Quote (LP_Soldier @ May 2 2015 10:00am)
i know it doesnt curve well at 6-7 mana considering dr boom, sylvanas etc. It rly depend if u draw dragon consort for a 7 mana lategame dragon.
I think the current meta going slower, so there might be potential. Mayve i will add one more equality...




as i said you have imperator thaurissan and dragon consort to speed it up. Also keep in mind the blackwing technician, aldon & sludge belchers work fine vs aggro
edit: iam open for a duell with the deck


If you don't get zombie AND antique, aggro is going to steamroll you. Even then you might just lose lol. If you want to play such a greedy deck, try ramp druid. At least they have multiple ways to play off curve. Thaurissan and consort do NOT justify this many 8+ drops, the meta also isn't slow atm. Lol hunter is everywhere, aggro mage is becoming popular,etc.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on May 3 2015 03:25am
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 8 2006
Gold: 19,387.00
May 3 2015 03:48am
Quote (DrLatBC @ May 3 2015 10:22am)
If you don't get zombie AND antique, aggro is going to steamroll you. Even then you might just lose lol. If you want to play such a greedy deck, try ramp druid. At least they have multiple ways to play off curve. Thaurissan and consort do NOT justify this many 8+ drops, the meta also isn't slow atm. Lol hunter is everywhere, aggro mage is becoming popular,etc.


The deck is rly similar to a control paladin, which also sustain aggros and cancer. I just switch boom, sylvanas, harrison & tirion to the dragons.
Beside that i have 2x blackwing technician for early game and 2xazure (might switch to 1 azure, seems like enough) for faster draw. Also keep in mind muster for battle, equality and cons can be directly use.
Its not that greed, dragon consort makes it viable.

Using ramp druid means no 7 mana dragons :(. the deck is very viable against control decks (once u reech 7 mana) and invent new techniques, especially chromagus and nefarian combos.

This post was edited by LP_Soldier on May 3 2015 03:55am
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
May 3 2015 03:58am
Quote (LP_Soldier @ May 3 2015 04:48am)
The deck is rly similar to a control paladin, which also sustain aggros and cancer. I just switch boom, sylvanas, harrison & tirion to the dragons.
Beside that i have 2x blackwing technician for early game and 2xazure (might switch to 1 azure, seems like enough) for faster draw. Also keep in mind muster for battle, equality and cons can be directly use.
Its not that greed, dragon consort makes it viable.

Using ramp druid means no 7 mana dragons :(. the deck is very viable against control decks and invent new techniques.


A control paladin doesn't run this many big threats. Harrison, boom, and Slyvanas can come out turns before the 8+ dragon and you don't need a consort to do so. Will this work well against control decks? Yessir. One problem with that, you are playing a super greedy deck in a meta full of aggro. Lol zoolock, hunter, and aggro mage are like everywhere.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on May 3 2015 03:59am
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 8 2006
Gold: 19,387.00
May 3 2015 04:02am
Quote (DrLatBC @ May 3 2015 10:58am)
A control paladin doesn't run this many big threats. Harrison, boom, and Slyvanas can come out turns before the 8+ dragon and you don't need a consort to do so. Will this work well against control decks? Yessir. One problem with that, you are playing a super greedy deck in a meta full of aggro. Lol


i think we have differ perspective of meta. Iam not legend atm.
But last year the meta was full of hunters and zoo (before undetaker nerf). It was like 70/30. now it change to 60/40 i think, also ppl changing to control hunter in higher ranks or am i wrong?

This post was edited by LP_Soldier on May 3 2015 04:03am
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
May 3 2015 04:04am
Quote (LP_Soldier @ May 3 2015 05:02am)
i think we have differ perspective of meta. Iam not legend atm.
But last year the meta was full of hunters and zoo (before undetaker) nerf. It was like 70/30. now it change to 60/40 i think.


Zoo is coming back. Hunter never left.

Still don't believe me? Check tempostorm's article... The literal first one has the headline "Aggro decks have seen a surge in popularity thanks to BRM"

I'm sorry, but this an aggro meta. Lol

Also "control hunter" is actually mid-range hunter, that still plays aggressively as hell.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on May 3 2015 04:09am
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 8 2006
Gold: 19,387.00
May 3 2015 04:10am
Quote (DrLatBC @ May 3 2015 11:04am)
Zoo is coming back. Hunter never left.

Still don't believe me? Check tempostorm's article... The literal first one has the headline "Aggro decks have seen a surge in popularity thanks to BRM"

I'm sorry, but this an aggro meta. Lol

Also "control hunter" is actually mid-range hunter, that still plays aggressively as hell.


when amy left, i stop to follow tempostorm articles
they didnt even mention rogue mill deck in the last few metas. Agressive is, when u have at 3 mana already 2xundertaker 3/4-4/5 and 2x Leepergnome and 1xWebspider^^

This post was edited by LP_Soldier on May 3 2015 04:11am
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
May 3 2015 04:13am
Quote (LP_Soldier @ May 3 2015 05:10am)
when amy left, i stop to follow tempostorm articles
they didnt even mention rogue mill deck in the last few metas. Agressive is, when u have at 3 mana already 2xundertaker 3/4-4/5 and 2x Leepergnome and 1xWebspider^^


Mill rogue sucks atm... That's why. Mill sucks against aggro, mill rogue sucks once you know how to play against it.

Midrange hunter is very simple. Play efficient as fuck minions and hit face unless there is a SUPER obvious trade. This is still aggro.
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 8 2006
Gold: 19,387.00
May 3 2015 04:21am
Quote (DrLatBC @ May 3 2015 11:13am)
Mill rogue sucks atm... That's why. Mill sucks against aggro, mill rogue sucks once you know how to play against it.

Midrange hunter is very simple. Play efficient as fuck minions and hit face unless there is a SUPER obvious trade. This is still aggro.


mill rogue has antique healbot (vs hunter), deathlord (vs zoo) and gang up. the only sucky part are the combos, when not having cold oracle and shadowstep...
But do not underestimate them, you can easily reech legend with this deck. Just adapt to it.
Member
Posts: 15,416
Joined: Feb 17 2014
Gold: 5.71
May 3 2015 04:24am
Quote (LP_Soldier @ May 3 2015 05:21am)
mill rogue has antique healbot (vs hunter), deathlord (vs zoo) and gang up. the only sucky part are the combos, when not having cold oracle and shadowstep...
But do not underestimate them, you can easily reech legend with this deck. Just adapt to it.


I have an entire mill rogue built. I use it often. It sucks in this meta. Easiest deck in their world to play against... Ready? Ignore everything and hit face. Kill Coldlight and nothing else.

Bam. Just taught you the secret to 70% win rate against mill rogue. Lol

Oil is far better than mill, by like a mile.

This post was edited by DrLatBC on May 3 2015 04:25am
Go Back To Hearthstone Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Trade New Service New Topic New Poll