Just curious, but what are your guys opinions on the Blood Mage? I know a lot of people regard him as being weak, but Banish sounds actually somewhat effective?
I'm kinda iffy about Siphon Mana, but im sure it can be nice if it's exploited well?

And would you ever consider substituting him in place of an Arch Mage? No Brilliance. is it this just a plain bad idea or would you consider combining the AM with the BM? Sounds kinda bad, but i could be wrong too. Lol. :X

This is for TFT 1v1's or 2v2's.


And yes, I know that Warcraft's about your skills and how good your usage is with the units, etc.
But what would you do?

BM is strong, flame strike rapes good and phoenix is nice to

noob u dont substitue u use both

blood mage sucks.

easy to kill and its spells arent very good, archmage > all for human, being able to summon knights and creep easy early is exactly what a human needs. also fits in well with things like a sky rush, also casters benefit from the aura.

if u 1v1 me with a bloodmage id rape u so hard the only blood would be coming from ur arse.

This post was edited by TerryWrist on Feb 18 2011 05:15am

hahaha, so far i remember you sucked pretty hard sry.. its all about how you play, watch Cool-T play BM hes good with it

vs me, il destroy u.

Sweet dreams

bloodmage is highly abusive. banish/siphon mana is such a funny combo. banish yourself then siphon mana, then put a priest on heal (2x the heal from amplify magic)

there are some basic strats to abuse bloodmage with, but it's fun to experiment!

personally, i found him most effective in a rifle-caster strat as secondary hero (AM first). do what you like & gl.

when you get good, post in my thread for wager games!

AKM )

bm/mk is strong if used well, but i guess most ppl here couldnt play it decent