He's not great.

Also I play toss so I want to see Nani or MC in the finals.

Vs. July or Bomber.

This post was edited by snoramej on Jun 19 2011 02:55pm

he is still a newcomer in the sc scene and whitera is better than moon

This post was edited by AemKei on Jun 19 2011 02:52pm

Implying that being good at sc1 has anything to do with being good at sc2

Sc2 is more like wc3 then sc1 I feel

White-ra is probably better then moon

But saying moon is a newcomer is funny as hell.

Moon is like boxer of the wc3 world.

If you're good at sc1 i cant see how you could possibly fail at sc2.

This is still going on? wtf...give me a link people

Yea being good at any rts helps in sc2 for sure. Yet being super good at sc1 does not automatically make you pro at sc2.

he is a newcomer to the sc scene, get over it...

my post refered to all the zergs QQ about toss.
whitera is just the better player and still lost with the OP race vs the UP race

This post was edited by AemKei on Jun 19 2011 02:59pm

Regardless of a players Sc1 status, White-ra has been prominent since beta and IS a better player. Didn't watch his games against moon yet but I'n willing to bet white-ra just goofed rather than getting beat while playing at his best.

This post was edited by TeH SaNdMaN on Jun 19 2011 03:01pm

Thats why 8 out of the top 16 were toss right?

Ofc not. But if you can handle a more difficult game like sc1 then you sure as hell have what it takes to play sc2 as well as you did sc1.


If you're a sc1 pro then you already have the fundamentals and the dedication etc.