d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Starcraft I & II > What Are The Main Diffs Between Sc1 & Sc2
Prev167891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 45,855
Joined: Jan 17 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Oct 15 2013 12:56pm
yahman
Member
Posts: 59,371
Joined: Feb 15 2009
Gold: 80.00
Oct 15 2013 01:11pm
sc2's main fault is that there is no iccup/lan or any shit like that
bw was kinda free to play just like lol/dota now...

Blizzard being money hungry takes away their money, how ironic.

This post was edited by Cpt_Ghost on Oct 15 2013 01:12pm
Member
Posts: 11,692
Joined: Feb 15 2009
Gold: 85.02
Oct 15 2013 01:23pm
Quote (Cpt_Ghost @ Oct 15 2013 02:11pm)
sc2's main fault is that there is no iccup/lan or any shit like that
bw was kinda free to play just like lol/dota now...

Blizzard being money hungry takes away their money, how ironic.


that's true but even if iccup was free, BW was much "deader" than sc2 is now or ever was in the west

Riot and Blizzard are both companies trying to make a profit, Riot just invested a lot more wisely and their game is simple enough for a free to play model to actually work and be profitable at the same time. SC2 simply wouldn't make sense with that kind of model. Even if you could buy skins for units, Riot creates new champions all the time for people to buy (and believe me people spend cash on this shit) and Blizzard doesn't have the luxury to just add units willy nilly. Not to mention the effect a bunch of weird colorful looking costumes would have on the actual gameplay.

Granted they could do something like make the multiplayer section of SC2 free and only charge for the campaigns/custom games but that would mean they lose out on a lot of money.

This post was edited by dwalk1989 on Oct 15 2013 01:25pm
Member
Posts: 59,371
Joined: Feb 15 2009
Gold: 80.00
Oct 15 2013 01:46pm
Quote (dwalk1989 @ 15 Oct 2013 20:23)
that's true but even if iccup was free, BW was much "deader" than sc2 is now or ever was in the west

Riot and Blizzard are both companies trying to make a profit, Riot just invested a lot more wisely and their game is simple enough for a free to play model to actually work and be profitable at the same time. SC2 simply wouldn't make sense with that kind of model. Even if you could buy skins for units, Riot creates new champions all the time for people to buy (and believe me people spend cash on this shit) and Blizzard doesn't have the luxury to just add units willy nilly. Not to mention the effect a bunch of weird colorful looking costumes would have on the actual gameplay.

Granted they could do something like make the multiplayer section of SC2 free and only charge for the campaigns/custom games but that would mean they lose out on a lot of money.


That's kind of what I was thinking, and yeah, people spend shittons of cash on stupid unimportant stuff.
If blizzard could make the multiplayer f2p and implement some more skins (like they've been experimenting with the war pig n zergling, ultralisk, thor stuff) decals and stuff to buy, I think they could still make a lot of profit out of it, not even mentioning that 2/3 of people (i would) would buy the game for the campaign. Also, changing the arcade shit just back to the same system it was in warcraft 3 would be just great.
Member
Posts: 11,692
Joined: Feb 15 2009
Gold: 85.02
Oct 15 2013 03:22pm
Quote (Cpt_Ghost @ Oct 15 2013 02:46pm)
That's kind of what I was thinking, and yeah, people spend shittons of cash on stupid unimportant stuff.
If blizzard could make the multiplayer f2p and implement some more skins (like they've been experimenting with the war pig n zergling, ultralisk, thor stuff) decals and stuff to buy, I think they could still make a lot of profit out of it, not even mentioning that 2/3 of people (i would) would buy the game for the campaign. Also, changing the arcade shit just back to the same system it was in warcraft 3 would be just great.


and automated tournaments
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Oct 15 2013 05:36pm
Quote (dwalk1989 @ Oct 15 2013 11:53am)
Something about vultures, dragoons with range, terran being required to get siege tanks fast, etc.

not unlike protoss getting sentries, terran getting a bunker, zerg getting several extra queens, etc


Vultures for aggressing and containing, much like hellions used to be used in TvZ before queen buff. Considerably unlike Protoss getting a sentry PvZ (which is basically 100% safety for 8 minutes on a FFE)
Member
Posts: 30,122
Joined: Feb 15 2006
Gold: 1,507.00
Oct 15 2013 06:24pm
Quote (dwalk1989 @ Oct 15 2013 04:22pm)
and automated tournaments


I would love the idea of automated tournaments. Rather than just a faceless grinding on ladder over and over. In a tourny, it would give it perhaps a different feel. It's always more exciting when it's a BO3, or BO5 against the same opponent. Would be cool as fuck actually
Member
Posts: 6,855
Joined: Jul 12 2007
Gold: 2,671.00
Oct 15 2013 07:12pm
its funny because wc3 had them

and a better custom game interface

and chat channels from release


battle.net 2.0 ladies and gents
Member
Posts: 30,122
Joined: Feb 15 2006
Gold: 1,507.00
Oct 15 2013 07:58pm
Quote (raineplayshalo2 @ Oct 15 2013 08:12pm)
its funny because wc3 had them

and a better custom game interface

and chat channels from release


battle.net 2.0 ladies and gents


:(
Member
Posts: 6,599
Joined: Feb 23 2010
Gold: 1,461.00
Oct 15 2013 10:07pm
Quote (raineplayshalo2 @ Oct 15 2013 08:12pm)
its funny because wc3 had them

and a better custom game interface

and chat channels from release


battle.net 2.0 ladies and gents


blizzard has totally destroyed its reputation and david kim has down syndrome

This post was edited by Perf3ction on Oct 15 2013 10:07pm
Go Back To Starcraft I & II Topic List
Prev167891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll