i did a level job and was stuck in diamond with an insane recordddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd


played liquid ret and other such pros/gms before getting put to masters

There's no such thing as "cheesy shit". If they can come up with anything to beat their opponent then it makes them that much better. If you need to win by a certain person's liking and standard just to be considered a fair player then that's ridiculous. Winning is winning.

Using a cheap technique which is two times easier to execute than to hold to beat someone doesn't make you the better player. Stating that is retarded.

in his defense, it is a game of war...and pretty much anything is fair in war if it gets you teh win

i dont play this game anymore cuz it's stagnant and basically the same shit every single game =/

That's true, but claiming that you were better than your opponent isn't a valid statement.

only if it's mixed into a best of 5 or something...

but ya, ppl that always/heavily play like that are funny to watch in macro games. they are usually so shitty that it's actually laughable


i am reminded of that time someone took a screenshot vs rapdawg and uploaded it while in the game roflll

Yeah it's okay to claim to be better if it was a bo x, since that implies mindgames aswell, but just beating someone in a bo1 (ladder) with cheese and claiming to be better is laughable.

if someone outsmarts you in one game they were the better player for that one game. confirm / deny?

>implying intelligence is needed to (often blindly) execute an allin build. confirm/deny?

>implying intelligence is needed to (often blindly) lose to an easy-to-stop all-in build. Confirm/deny?

If you don't outsmart your opponent and lose, he outsmarted you.