Quote (DaZe858 @ Sep 10 2010 04:26am)
Do you read? That's not me in the quote.
I was trying to point out that you completely misunderstood what he was trying to say and that you came off as a complete retard.
I apologize, I just remember seeing the quote and my train of thought switches from studying to making a quick response.
First of all, he was using the ball 'moving back and forth on the court' as a series of games. Basically, he used it as Bianka should be given the chance of having the ball, and then me, and repeat.
What happens is the person that holds possession of the ball determines who's is better is what he believes how the game of "skill" should be. He wanted to make sure that each player had the opportunity to "make an offensive play".
In my response, I told him that he was using the wrong comparison. He used the ball traveling back and forth as a series of game, and not skill.
If I held possession to the ball, I am the person making the first "attempt"; thus I would be the person to either make the score or make the mistake.
He believed that if I was the person to make the first "attempt" and "scored" instead of making a mistake, then it wouldn't be a "skillful" game because the opposing team didn't have possession to the ball. If you recall by reading further back into the conversation, he assumed that less length duration of the game is less skill.
Some kid praised to him and said that his comparison was retarded. The form of Soccor would be the proper comparison because both players have the opportunity to attempt the first action. In any case, it doesn't matter.
I am going to put this in terms of the game that we played.
Bianka had possession of the ball and he makes the first move. My goal as the opposing team is to defend, or catch him off his mistake and react with the advantage I have by adapting to his mistake.
Bianka made an early push, attempting to make an early victory. I prepared myself and defended, and used the advantage that I got and made got myself into the position of winning the game.
All in all, the argument was "less duration = less skill" from Dwalk. That is false, because the opposing player who loss is at fault for having made the mistake. Winning in a series of 3 or 5 games is just about who is going to make more mistakes.
I clearly did not apply the game of me winning as a boast to myself being better than Bianka. As previously said, I said I beat him because he wanted to be this big confident person in a absurdly rude manner. People come off with the persona that I am 'trying to prove myself that I am better than bianka' when I am just trying to show to him that he needs to stop talking shit because there are definitely people on JSP who are not 'known' that can beat him, whether its bo1/3/5.
As you can see, Dwalk clearly said in the quote that "I wanted to prove that I am truly the better player." As much as I have to say, that was not what I was trying to prove, and because he and everyone else who joined in the conversation was not there in-game, they do not know what the conversation is about and believe that I am the cocky ass bastard trying to show that I am the best off of one game.
The reason why it is like that is because there is a gap from nothing to something. There was nothing, just Bianka making that first post in Round 1. Then suddenly there's this big story. It's because both Nova and I didn't bother to go and boast about our winnings against him, there was nothing to prove. But when he constantly babbles about the same crap and continues the shit talk, it becomes unbearable to see the same guy that hasn't learned his lesson about belitting JSP players, so I made the effort of diving into the story. So suddenly, its nothing to "whoa what the fuck."
I don't care if I've been repeating myself in this subject between me and him. I am not here to prove to him that I am the better player, or even find something that I can troll about. I've only made the same response each time because everything he said was the same content of shit talk, just in different phrases. I constantly replied to him because as many times as I said it, "stop fucking talking shit."
This post was edited by RecenT on Sep 9 2010 11:16pm