Quote (NoLimit028 @ Mar 20 2014 11:03am)
Id think queens and spines could hold it, or roach, or ling bane, or ling roach bane, or any combination of these.
The maps are huge, I don't see how it could be unstoppable is the point.
You would definitely need banelings IMO. It's instant death if you go 3 bases, and if you go 2 base baneling you're thrown off quite a bit even if you do hold. Big larva investment + big gas investment. And even then it's not a definite hold with banelings, depends on the split and if marauders tank any of the bane hits.
If the Zerg does hold, I think Terran ends up in a stronger position in either case. So much has to be invested in the early game for Zerg that the drone count is going to be low. Terran, on the other hand, doesn't have to cut SCV production to keep army production going. Zerg is still up a base and has some "tech" and has an early gas income (that can be used for a bane timing or a fast lair) but has a low drone count from making early lings and has a "standard" 1 base advantage. Possibly low queen count as well, depends on how the hold goes. So it's not definitely game over for Zerg, but I think that even the cost of holding an attack like this puts Zerg in a rough spot.
You could be right though, the map size could be a big enough factor so that the timing is rendered useless. If it is, this game has gone even more to shit than when I really followed the scene xD Blizzard is becoming the next Riot instead of the next Valve.