Quote (Perf3ction @ May 5 2013 05:57pm)
i find protoss builds are far more easily executed in that matchup... the macro req alone for terran is definitely way greater
as for the micro, you have to be at a certain level to compete with a decent protoss - and imo, it's only when you have viking + emp wars. if you die earlier than those battles, probably not macroing that well or responding poorly, got harassed, etc...that would be my guess. address micro when you are on equal terms.
toss has to have effective templar split and good storms to beat a good terran.
but i would generally agree that the req for terran is higher. you are also very capable of being the aggressor until 3 base (toss), so that gives you some nice opportunities to take a macro lead.
if im not mistaken, you talk about how your EMP control is not good...that's gonna hurt really bad in the lategame. i usually find terrans unbeatable once they hit a certain ghost count. if i win, it's usually because they fucked up lol.
idk, i dont think it's that bad. you just need better mechanics as the terran. seen plenty of terrans rip into toss with sick micro...so it's more than possible.
Nevada has the macro of MVP and the control of MMA, this doesn't apply here