d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Other Games > Starcraft I & II > David Kim
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 454Replies: 33Track Topic
Member
Posts: 34,624
Joined: Aug 7 2007
Gold: 514.30
#21
Dec 3 2012 04:53pm
Quote (LegendaryIcicle @ Dec 3 2012 03:33pm)
Protoss air is just bad in general.
Get rid of voidray, oracle, mothership
Bring back arbitor and something else that doesn't suck dick.


bring back dragoons

also what happened with the cliff jumping lings

This post was edited by Death_killaxx on Dec 3 2012 04:54pm
Member
Posts: 50,348
Joined: Aug 12 2007
Gold: 80.00
Warn: 60%
#22
Dec 3 2012 04:57pm
Quote (Cpt_Ghost @ Dec 3 2012 06:48pm)
My friend actually suggested vortex to be like the stasis field, so it sucks units in only the moment it's created, and you are not able to bring more units into it afterwards, so it would work like the stasis field, wich is a quite nice idea imo.
And Protoss needs some aoe in their air composition imo, a spell for oracle should do it, or an antimatter misille with a cd, like the haywire missilles were for the warhound or smthing.


A unit like corsair with 1 additional ability would be really good for Protoss
AoE vs muta ballz (theres no actual efficient way to counter mass ballz of mutas other than storm)
Air defense against drops, terrans have vikings patrolling the perimeter to avoid drops, zerg is just zerg
Disruption Web for harassment styles

It'll open up so many different openings for protoss, pvt especially.
Member
Posts: 34,624
Joined: Aug 7 2007
Gold: 514.30
#23
Dec 3 2012 05:40pm
Quote (LegendaryIcicle @ Dec 3 2012 03:57pm)
A unit like corsair with 1 additional ability would be really good for Protoss
AoE vs muta ballz (theres no actual efficient way to counter mass ballz of mutas other than storm)
Air defense against drops, terrans have vikings patrolling the perimeter to avoid drops, zerg is just zerg
Disruption Web for harassment styles

It'll open up so many different openings for protoss, pvt especially.


Archons good units
Member
Posts: 59,371
Joined: Feb 15 2009
Gold: 80.00
#24
Dec 3 2012 05:43pm
Quote (LegendaryIcicle @ 3 Dec 2012 23:57)
A unit like corsair with 1 additional ability would be really good for Protoss
AoE vs muta ballz (theres no actual efficient way to counter mass ballz of mutas other than storm)
Air defense against drops, terrans have vikings patrolling the perimeter to avoid drops, zerg is just zerg
Disruption Web for harassment styles

It'll open up so many different openings for protoss, pvt especially.

yeah
allthough
blizz should focus changes for the mid and lategame imo, creating more ways for build order losses is not a way to go.
Member
Posts: 50,348
Joined: Aug 12 2007
Gold: 80.00
Warn: 60%
#25
Dec 3 2012 05:58pm
Quote (Cpt_Ghost @ Dec 3 2012 07:43pm)
yeah
allthough
blizz should focus changes for the mid and lategame imo, creating more ways for build order losses is not a way to go.


I don't think it'll be necessarily build order losses tho
Just like buffing mech to having mech play viable vs protoss, fixing stargate so stargate play (incorporated with gateways of course, can't do pure stargate just like you can't do pure robo) can be a viable option vs terran could be good
It just opens up a greater pool of meta gaming, not necessarily where build A > build B > build C > build D > build A like we have now but a web of builds where build A > build B/build D build B > etc etc etc



Really curious to what they're going to do with bio tho.
I agree bio buff is needed but only after the midgame
Member
Posts: 11,692
Joined: Feb 15 2009
Gold: 85.02
#26
Dec 3 2012 06:00pm
Quote (LegendaryIcicle @ Dec 3 2012 05:57pm)
A unit like corsair with 1 additional ability would be really good for Protoss
AoE vs muta ballz (theres no actual efficient way to counter mass ballz of mutas other than storm)
Air defense against drops, terrans have vikings patrolling the perimeter to avoid drops, zerg is just zerg
Disruption Web for harassment styles

It'll open up so many different openings for protoss, pvt especially.


your diamond status is showing
Member
Posts: 50,348
Joined: Aug 12 2007
Gold: 80.00
Warn: 60%
#27
Dec 3 2012 06:01pm
Quote (Cpt_Ghost @ Dec 3 2012 07:43pm)
yeah
allthough
blizz should focus changes for the mid and lategame imo, creating more ways for build order losses is not a way to go.


I don't think it'll be necessarily build order losses tho
Just like buffing mech to having mech play viable vs protoss, fixing stargate so stargate play (incorporated with gateways of course, can't do pure stargate just like you can't do pure robo) can be a viable option vs terran could be good
It just opens up a greater pool of meta gaming, not necessarily where build A > build B > build C > build D > build A like we have now but a web of builds where build A > build B/build D build B > etc etc etc



Really curious to what they're going to do with bio tho.
I agree bio buff is needed but only after the midgame
Member
Posts: 25,215
Joined: Sep 7 2008
Gold: 3,269.57
#28
Dec 3 2012 07:41pm
Quote (LegendaryIcicle @ Dec 3 2012 02:57pm)
muta ballz


muta ballz
Member
Posts: 50,348
Joined: Aug 12 2007
Gold: 80.00
Warn: 60%
#29
Dec 3 2012 07:45pm
Quote (Burzum @ Dec 3 2012 09:41pm)
muta ballz


jajaja >
Member
Posts: 25,215
Joined: Sep 7 2008
Gold: 3,269.57
#30
Dec 3 2012 07:55pm
Quote (LegendaryIcicle @ Dec 3 2012 05:45pm)
jajaja >


Go Back To Starcraft I & II Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact