like i haven't been saying that bullshit for all the time .
terran has no lategame, compared to other races.
you have to be sixteenhundredmillion times better than your opponent if you want to win unless you all in, but that's just stupid, especially since players actually learned to play and learned how to scout them and defend them.
same thing implies for tvz.

ty for understanding my struggle
if u dont play 100% perfect with ur unit control u auto lose

That's the story of protoss with templar styles.

ty for understanding my struggle

could go mech vs zerg i guess. Does it work well vs protoss?

tvz mech is viable and ravens do very well against any spire tech

explain the difficulties of templar play, beside dealing with banshee play, pls bro.




mech is retarded imo, you only depend on how retarded/incompetent the zerg is, not on your skills. when i was doing mech i kinda felt like i was playing protoss.

This post was edited by Cpt_Ghost on May 4 2012 03:42pm

Yes, Mech is great for protoss. Most terrans aren't very good at this game and only a few of the best ones can actually make it work. Pheww

not get emped If u get most/all of them emped, ur prob dead.

LOL



what really annoys me though is I outmacro literally 100% of the Protoss players I face (my macro is GOD), snipe expansions/tech while he does nothing..... yet only win 50%...? Why is that?



Whats more annoying though is having the right counter in the late game when they can warp in 15 random units and you have to QUEUE UP counter units out of a rax/sp ahead of time

u also have sentries and colosus that help so much... u have to hugee aoe units that rape us hardcore

u can tech to templar or colossus and be fine while we have to play based on what you teched towards



its tough
its differnt than meching against other races