Quote (nerobellum @ Nov 9 2012 12:58am)
"i don't know you, but your opinion on game balance and difficulty from an unbiased and mechanical standpoint differ from mine, so you MUST be bad."
1 - When you have an opinion of something that isn't subjective and your opinion is wrong then there's no point trying to have a discussion.
2 - Understanding of the game has a direct correlation to skill level, if you understood the game then you would be at a decent skill level. Understanding of the game alone will get you to masters.
3 - This has nothing to do with game balance.
Quote (Cpt_Ghost @ Nov 9 2012 01:01am)
If you don't understand my point then you should reconsider your statement of having an understanding of the game l, while living the dream of protosses.
Excuse me for mistakes in the text, still from phone.

Protoss units aren't the most cost effective, your statement is wrong. Cost effectiveness relates to, well, the cost. When a Terran army can decimate a Protoss army for half the cost then tell me who's more cost effective? PvT engagements , from both sides, require positioning and whoever has the superior will usually win. In most occasions the Protoss army is going to cost a lot more and even then that doesn't mean you're going to win the battle. Protoss units are only cost effective when they have good positioning and even then if you lose those high cost units you can't do much. Gateway armies are useless without Colossus or High Templar support. So in a battle if you lose those units and try to be aggressive with gateway reinforcements you're probably not going to have much success unless you're already ahead with a huge bank.
I understand your point, but your point is wrong.