I find NA and EU basically the same. KR has the best players (they're more...sneaky) obviously. SEA is total shit and I was playing GMs within 10 games as zerg (lol).

as for NA vs EU...I find NA players more cheesy. and EU players never leave the game until they have zero units left on the field -.-. NAs give up a lot easier.

that's about it~

This

EU > NA



also, EU is fucking BM--- even worse than NA, and it's not like I was playing random/cheesing over there.

This post was edited by SniXSniPe on Apr 14 2013 01:26am

This, but mainly because of the larger population of NA. More people means more retards.

eu and na is the same.
- My honnest opinion

e:
If you are grandmaster on NA you are probably also grandmaster on eu, viseversa.

This post was edited by crazysmoker92 on Apr 14 2013 01:53am

Not really... Americans pros got nothing on the average European pro...
Why you think all those Koreans signed up at NA for wcs? Free wins lol.

And the European talent pool is a lot deeper as well.

This post was edited by ComicsMan on Apr 14 2013 02:28am

Thats not true, American pros are good too. Look at huk, he was doing "good" for a foreigner in gsl.

na is plain trash...like a few good players but rest jus suck bad

I have 100% winrate in pvp on NA-



Going on KR to get master there now.

21-10 on eu (master)
18-7 on na (master)
6-1 on kr (platin)

This post was edited by crazysmoker92 on Apr 14 2013 05:27am

You really improved a lot lately. Last time we played you were trying to break into diamond

Well Huk has some nice results in the past yes.
However... that's just one guy and if you look closely he's 8 gate or fail... not much skill there and everyone pretty much figured him out.