Quote (canetoado @ Sep 2 2013 02:22am)
tell david kim to cut that "asymmetrical balance" bullshit and sc2 will be a good game
guaranteed
give each race equally good late game, and you will have much more entertaining matches
don't make mechanics like they are now, where protoss is ez mode in lower leagues, and you will get a bigger target audience population
get rid of this "i have to break zerg before xx minutes or i lose" philosophy
every race should have plenty of aggressive options AND defensive options (case in point: zerg has no viable early attack vs terran right now. you build 1 or 2 siege tanks and a roach baneling bust is auto-loss)
AOE nukes are too powerful. Widow mines, psi storm, WOL fungal, EMP with 2 radius.
The shitty custom map system (why could they not recycle the same system from War3 TFT? That's the system that gave us 3C, DOTA, legion TD, footman frenzy, etc)
asymmetrical balance is fine, it just means every race is much different but the game is still balanced
symmetrical balance would basically mean there is only one race
there really isnt a "break zerg before xx minutes or i lose" scenario in hots, that was wol. if anything that scenario would be more fitting for tvp but still not really
i agree with everything else though
i also really like how MC brought up how terran doesnt even need to scout tvz and zerg is bottlenecked into one army composition