worth dlc def if they can pull the game off

Ofc, I don't have many doubts, though I did read a post elsewhere that said it was extremely challenging and without different difficults, probably to gear it towards 4 player etc.

lol?

The GTAIV ones are huge expansions that are over 2 gigs in size.

And iirc, there was a significant amount of time between games release & first DLC & new DLC.

Yeah, like 8 months

its still gay, because the whole point of DLC is to give you EXTRA content. if you're paying for it, it's not extra content.

before Xbox 360 there was no such thing as "paying for DLC" it was ALWAYS free. which is why the DLC trend pisses me off.

It's no different than paying for an expansion pack on a pc game.

expansion packs are new content, not content cut from the game to release later as DLC.

lol?

DLC only started around 2004. It was the point you get more content if you buy more. Thats the point.

And the predecessor to DLC was disked expansions, which costed money.

Regardless if your paying its still extra content. You cant honestly expect a company who spend thousands on man hours working on the DLC to give it for free.



Not all DLC is cut content...Most isnt.

This post was edited by SalvationDG on Oct 17 2009 01:54pm

like re5 as well

the dlc was already on the game u just had to buy to unlock it

This post was edited by Doom0277 on Oct 17 2009 01:55pm