d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > World of Warcraft >
Poll > Legendary Transmog > Some Ideas...possible Gold Sink?
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Jan 16 2011
Gold: 335,918.00
Dec 11 2014 05:36pm
Just an idea I was thinkin about. Let's be honest, with the black market AH, nothing is sacred. It is just a matter of time before we see black qiraji battle tank and corrupted ashbringer on there (that is another poll for another time ;D).

With legendary items getting older and older, and the novelty of owning them has kind of worn off, what are your opinions on allowing legendary transmogs. I know some people will say that it is sacrilegious, an abomination and I am a retard for even bringing this up, others may not. Realistically, I think it could be a viable gold sink if the price tag were high enough.

I personally wouldn't mind seeing this implemented for a price/gold sink. I don't think they are really that special anymore and it would be kind of cool to see them running around again.

Let me know!
Member
Posts: 2,461
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 0.00
Dec 11 2014 05:50pm
yes
Member
Posts: 34,599
Joined: Mar 25 2009
Gold: 12,633.00
Dec 11 2014 06:11pm
yes... no charge.
Member
Posts: 22,037
Joined: Jul 14 2007
Gold: 1.18
Dec 11 2014 07:53pm
Yes, farming most legendaries is a pain in the ass anyways, so just regular charge
Member
Posts: 33,939
Joined: Sep 21 2006
Gold: 235.00
Dec 11 2014 08:44pm
Should allow the xmog as they arent 100% special past is being current content and people loves the skins.
Member
Posts: 23,966
Joined: Jul 8 2007
Gold: 137.01
Dec 11 2014 10:02pm
Then you'll see glaives and thunderfury literally everywhere in Stormsheild.

Not like I really care since I'm always in my garrison jumping around the fountain anyways.
Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Jan 10 2014
Gold: Locked
Dec 11 2014 10:52pm
GLAIVES GALORE
Member
Posts: 10,935
Joined: Dec 27 2007
Gold: 20.00
Dec 11 2014 11:01pm
no!

Legendaries are legendaries... You cannot turn a non legendary into looking like a legendary.
The hand of ragnaros lookalike from firelands were enough!
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Jan 16 2011
Gold: 335,918.00
Dec 12 2014 05:10am
Quote (eLmasten @ Dec 11 2014 11:01pm)
no!

Legendaries are legendaries... You cannot turn a non legendary into looking like a legendary.
The hand of ragnaros lookalike from firelands were enough!


Sorry d3 killed this :)

What is the benefit of not doing it? I don't know why it is a "bad" thing if "everyone" (which is exaggerated) is running around with glaives and thunderfury...especially at an extremely inflated price etc

I'm thinkin of this more as a practical, and continual gold sink.
Member
Posts: 10,804
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 170.02
Dec 12 2014 07:18am
I agree with elmasten. Leave them to be their own. The fact that "d3 did it" doesn't help the debate imo. They're legendary and imo means they are the only object of their kind. And should not be able to have its image replicated for another item to mimic its appearance.
Go Back To World of Warcraft Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll