d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion >
Poll > Eth Bugged Prudence Armor For Aow Bvb > Discuss...
Prev14567815Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 8 2017 12:31pm
Quote (TR0LLFACE @ 8 Mar 2017 20:17)
Second queston: who the fuck have invet word " eth bugged " ? Seriously ? What " bugged " is about cube formula what anyone can do and what is made by Blizzard ? Eth cubed sounds more reasonable. Or does in Arreat Summit says " damn bugged secrit formula to only few ppl " ?

e: I know it is common term in trade section example, but seriously what bugged is it ? It is only a one cube formula :D Nothing " bugged " in my eyes.. It probably will beat Enigma setup, thats all :D


Rly dunno either.. :p

E; not sure if it 'beats' eni setup.

Eni setup gives you a big life boost, used with eth upped arreats with zod to get some def atleast.

This post was edited by Klaasje123 on Mar 8 2017 12:32pm
Member
Posts: 31,637
Joined: Aug 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 8 2017 12:48pm
Quote (Klaasje123 @ Mar 8 2017 06:53pm)
Well I think ppl who knows it good enough should be able to vote.

Lots of Liskods friends are in aow/bvb scene.

Are ppl like spaz and sepulba also jot allowed to vote? Cmon maye



Yes, I agree on the fact that there are also some 'rands' just say smt without knowing. Liskod1 isnt like that.


Sorry but this is just plain stupid. Let's all invite our friends and vote then, smh

Of course people like spaz are not allowed, lol. He has never even joined a bvb game.

Sorry but i wont discuss this any further with you, your arguments are stubborn as much as it gets.
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 8 2017 12:59pm
Quote (Argand @ 8 Mar 2017 20:48)
Sorry but this is just plain stupid. Let's all invite our friends and vote then, smh

Of course people like spaz are not allowed, lol. He has never even joined a bvb game.

Sorry but i wont discuss this any further with you, your arguments are stubborn as much as it gets.


ok.

So.. I dont follow politics in my country, the Netherlands.
So I am not allowed to vote, just because I am not following it?

This seems weird, but in fact it's the same as Liskod and TROLLFACE not being allowed to vote here. Exact the same..

Ofc this in here isnt 'official'.

PS. We dont HAVE TO vote in the Netherlands.

But answer TROLLFACE his question..
Its just a cube recipe, so..

This post was edited by Klaasje123 on Mar 8 2017 01:01pm
Member
Posts: 24,578
Joined: Mar 30 2005
Gold: 201,508.60
Mar 8 2017 01:04pm
Tbh , back when we voted , al builds where different , mostly enig build , if u add a massive defense armor into these times it would have been op
But as it is now , every1 is using eth sa +2600 def , with the advantage of 2 socks against the ad of def in prudence .

I,m not sure if it is stil this op as it was when we voted back in the days .

I'mo it shut be tested out to be sure ; so for now i say NO .

Quote (vOoLdO @ Mar 7 2017 08:26pm)
I voted yes cuz i think its worth to try.

Its years since this was tested last time and eq changed to the better massivly since that.
Worst case scenario its just to move it back to the not allowed list again.


Only way to know is to make a tour with eth prudence allowed and see the results:)


hm true , lets host another test tour after current where we allow prudence , and ppl have to mention if they played prudence or not when score report , this way we can overview how it matches vs other builds out there

i did vote no , but thats cuz i want it to be tested first to put in on the rules . But a tryout tournament aint bad .

This post was edited by cranium-sf on Mar 8 2017 01:08pm
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 8 2017 01:10pm
Quote (cranium-sf @ 8 Mar 2017 21:04)
Tbh , back when we voted , al builds where different , mostly enig build , if u add a massive defense armor into these times it would have been op
But as it is now , every1 is using eth sa +2600 def , with the advantage of 2 socks against the ad of def in prudence .

I,m not sure if it is stil this op as it was when we voted back in the days .

I'mo it shut be tested out to be sure ; so for now i say NO .


THats what Vooldo and I are saying all along: First TEST it out.

But if you check the facts, and also what you say urself.. everyone already has a eth/rep armor, arkys or Hades. So Ebugged prudence isnt OP anymore. I fact.. I think I prefer enigma over prudence myself.
But it could be another possibility for new players wanting aow bvb, without relying on Enigma. (so those ppl can choose between mass life or mass def).

Also what TROLLFACE said, again.. It's weird that they called it a 'bug', Eth cubed orso would be a better name. and in this case it can be allowed.

But again.. Test it out next tour. Quite sure barely any1 will use it anyway though.
Member
Posts: 31,637
Joined: Aug 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 8 2017 01:12pm
Quote (Klaasje123 @ Mar 8 2017 07:59pm)
ok.

So.. I dont follow politics in my country, the Netherlands.
So I am not allowed to vote, just because I am not following it?

This seems weird, but in fact it's the same as Liskod and TROLLFACE not being allowed to vote here. Exact the same..

Ofc this in here isnt 'official'.

PS. We dont HAVE TO vote in the Netherlands.
.


i dont know who liskod or trollface are but they dont play bvb. i have never seen them play bvb. not aow, not ffa.
which means they dont know what they are talking about and have absolutely no right to vote about bvb rules.
they dont live in netherlands, they're from belgium. so why should they be allowed to vote in netherlands?

This post was edited by Argand on Mar 8 2017 01:12pm
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 8 2017 01:14pm
Quote (Argand @ 8 Mar 2017 21:12)
i dont know who liskod or trollface are but they dont play bvb. i have never seen them play bvb. not aow, not ffa.
which means they dont know what they are talking about and have absolutely no right to vote about bvb rules.
they dont live in netherlands, they're from belgium. so why should they be allowed to vote in netherlands?


It was just an example from me.

Forbid people to vote because they never joined/participated/follow it is the same as citizens not being allowed to vote at politics/president or w/e because they dont follow it.

This post was edited by Klaasje123 on Mar 8 2017 01:14pm
Member
Posts: 31,637
Joined: Aug 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 8 2017 01:17pm
Quote (Klaasje123 @ Mar 8 2017 08:14pm)
It was just an example from me.

Forbid people to vote because they never joined/participated/follow it is the same as citizens not being allowed to vote at politics/president or w/e because they dont follow it.


if so, EVERY user on jsp should vote. that's what your argument means. if so, why dont you just ruin aow completely by letting non-barb-players vote about other bvb-related contents as well?
i cant believe this :wallbash:
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 8 2017 01:20pm
Quote (Argand @ 8 Mar 2017 21:17)
if so, EVERY user on jsp should vote. that's what your argument means. if so, why dont you just ruin aow completely by letting non-barb-players vote about other bvb-related contents as well?
i cant believe this :wallbash:


Difference is that those people who voted so far (TROLLFACE and Liskod) DO have atleast a LITTLE knowledge.

I told u earlier that I agree with you on that 'rand' people voting shouldnt count (But these arent 'rand' people, so)

Anyway.. we're getting really off topic...

So...
Back about Prudence:

Why is it called Eth BUGGED prudence, while its a cube recipe? A ladder only recipe. Just like upping from exceptional to Elite is ladder only.

E;
IMO you cant just say 'NO', without even trying and looking at other peoples opinions.

And again.. (AS Vooldo, me and Cranium already said) we can test it....

Prudence eth cubed isnt as OP as it was 5 or 7 years ago (2012/2010)

This post was edited by Klaasje123 on Mar 8 2017 01:24pm
Member
Posts: 31,183
Joined: Feb 1 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 8 2017 01:22pm
This vote result here cant rly be counted.
And it doesnt matter for the mom.

Testing first and if it would show its not op at all vs current barbbuilds we need a closed voting.

But an Aow tour usually takes 2months with 14-16 players.
This tour is 25plsyers and things stopped up abit as ush when 30-40% is done.

So i think this prudence tour is atleast 2months away snd therefor no idea to knock urselves bloody here alrdy :)

The prudence tour will aswell take some time and after that this should be abit more "up to date discussion".

This post was edited by vOoLdO on Mar 8 2017 01:25pm
Go Back To Diablo 2 Discussion Topic List
Prev14567815Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll