Tbh , back when we voted , al builds where different , mostly enig build , if u add a massive defense armor into these times it would have been op
But as it is now , every1 is using eth sa +2600 def , with the advantage of 2 socks against the ad of def in prudence .
I,m not sure if it is stil this op as it was when we voted back in the days .
I'mo it shut be tested out to be sure ; so for now i say NO .
Quote (vOoLdO @ Mar 7 2017 08:26pm)
I voted yes cuz i think its worth to try.
Its years since this was tested last time and eq changed to the better massivly since that.
Worst case scenario its just to move it back to the not allowed list again.
Only way to know is to make a tour with eth prudence allowed and see the results:)
hm true , lets host another test tour after current where we allow prudence , and ppl have to mention if they played prudence or not when score report , this way we can overview how it matches vs other builds out there
i did vote no , but thats cuz i want it to be tested first to put in on the rules . But a tryout tournament aint bad .
This post was edited by cranium-sf on Mar 8 2017 01:08pm