I just don't get people's logic.

If you can't sell it yourself, what's the point of sitting on an item worth 20 000 forum gold? Then it's ultimately worth nothing. If you need someone else's help to sell it, they should get as much as they deserve. Why should they only get below 1% as most people here suggest? That's pretty illogical.

i feel like this is somehow gunna end up in s/a with someone getting locked over some junk javs you guys think are worth 20k

It really isn't illogical. To suggest like you have that 80% is fair in some cases is illogical.
The seller of the 20k item decides what he will give as a bonus to the one who helped find a buyer. And it still have nothing to so with how rich or poor the buyer, seller or helper is.

It should.

But you give no reasoning behind why you think it should.

I've done that earlier in the thread.

As an example:

You and a friend go to the store to buy a loaf of bread. You have $20 and your friend had 5$.
Your friend buys a loaf of bread for $2.50, 50% of his money.
So do you pay $10 for the same loaf of bread, 50% of your money?

I thought not.
It boggles the mind what liberal minds come up with in the name of supposed fairness.

Not 50% perhaps, but say 0.25% and 0.50%. If society and the world was a fair place, then yes, prices should be calculated like that, to prevenet class distinction and ultimately power imbalance. Why should someone that works as a doctor make 50 times more than someone that works as a street sweeper? A little bit of difference is okay, hence my calculations, but too much is unhealthy and unfair.

But that is my question. Are you doing that now? Paying more when you have more? If not, then you are the worst type of hypocrite.

Actually, yes.