Quote (og_loc_resurection @ Dec 22 2005, 03:39 AM)
Quote
.If i remember they all play without block i can understand they had bad time with a barb like u .
honestly ull need to have 105fcr to actually not avoid ww with 163fcr setup.......i havent lost with my druid long time with barb .... and 90% of time i dont bother using dr....
i bet top druid max block could rape any barb from what i see around .........
if u telling me no block druid cant beat good barb its funny.
Uh. I dont really get what you're writing, but I assume you mean that barbs need 105% fcr to catch a 163% fcr druid? That argument is very flawed.
1. Barbs can catch 7/8 fps tele sorcs with 40% fcr but cant catch a 10 fps tele druid? Seriously? Yes yes of course you can teleport to cold plains, probably without getting hit. Dont expect any non-retarded barb to follow though. If you expect to actually _hit_ the barb you _will_ get caught.
2. When you get caught with 163% fcr you are dead meat in 2 wws (or one if you're weak). Period.
3. Tell me how you beat a defensive barb with widowmaker. Your fcr doesn't matter, you _have_ to get close to hit him cause he will tear you down with namelock GA, and sooner or later trigger lifetap.
Druids without block cant beat any decent barb. Barbs have the advantage over ALL druids, even maxblock ones. To win vs good barbs the druid WILL have to play BETTER. Simple as that. But then again you're the one who thinks kickers >>> barbs lol.
Send a PM to luis19 on this forum. He should be able to beat most druids, at least that's what he says (please kill him so I cant taunt ^^).
All druids in europe NL who think they own barbs: post account HERE. _Dont_ PM cause I cant read them. At least my inbox is full now so people should get it lol.