Quote (Synonym @ Apr 25 2011 03:32am)
ololololololol you and 3rd grade math are absolutely NOT friends obviously

between 100 and 150 there's always a 1.5 difference? rly? how about when you deal 50% more dmg? 100 turns to 150 and 150 turns to 225. still a 1.5 difference? jesus christ LOL
i have shown dps based on fpa. fpa = xx atk/s. you're just too clueless to realize obviously.
I now understand why you provoke in all your post (besides the fact you're a troll)
You most likely didn't like me reply there :
http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=54014961&f=87
Gold ilvl chart. ^^
150 * 1,5 = 225
~~
Quote (Synonym @ Apr 25 2011 03:32am)
gt/t gets (4.5 atk/s)
gpa gets (4.16 atk/s)
gt/t 115avg on eth *4.40 = 508avg + 40% cb (0.4*4.5=1.8 cb strikes per sec)
gpa 129avg on eth *4.40 = 569avg + 40% cb (0.4*4.16 = 1.6 cb strikes per sec)
20 extra cb strikes / 200 extra cb strikes far outweigh 61 avg dmg.
Here you're dmg are shown per hit and cb strikes shown per sec.
And you compare them, how coherent !
Then, 508 * 4,5 = 2286 (+ 1,8 cb/sec) vs 569 * 4,16 = 2367 (+ 1,6 cb/sec), should be what you'd have to compare.
And anyway, these maths would still be wrong because they include only jab, and do not include normal attacks (©).
This is my last post in here, last time was enjoyable but now I just waste my time.
Quote (AtreyuRocks @ Apr 24 2011 04:04am)
..... You obviously read the original topics ...... But use what you want man.
I didn't.
And the "worse" part is, I do not say CA/CV > GT/T or the other way around.
I just say this statement from synonym "in truth g.thresher/thresher > all" is wrong because/and/or incomplete.