d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion >
Poll > Eth Bugged Prudence Armor For Aow Bvb > Discuss...
Prev11112131415Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 27,898
Joined: Sep 2 2008
Gold: 295,440.29
Mar 9 2017 07:55am
Quote (Argand @ Mar 9 2017 01:41pm)
2011 ^^


^^ beginning 2011



This post was edited by iridius on Mar 9 2017 07:56am
Member
Posts: 62,135
Joined: Jun 14 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 100%
Mar 9 2017 08:41am
Quote (iridius @ 9 Mar 2017 14:37)
Was allowed till 2010, still is allowed in lld for example.

Mayby we do test and allow it for 1 next tour. And will see how meny ppls will be using it and chek if it ryl gives advantage vs other arms. Imo its fair solution.


just for a short period of time. because some ppl cant follow common sense
prudence is a lvl49 rw

its also a important playstyle rule. who would not use a 4kdef armor.from that point we could allowed forty and smash the best balanced ruleset in history

Go. FFa

not important for the asked question, but still on point

Quote (DerGuN @ 29 Nov 2011 17:15)
aow had/has some basic point in the rules. the reason behind those rules was to allow as much as possible setups for bvb.

the main rules are:
- max. 10% ow(ok, thats a playstyle rule ofc. nothing beats ow and if we would had allowed unlimited ow, there wouldnt be any fun, just lame hit and wait fights)
- no grief / forti allowed(so why is that. if both were an option, we wouldnt use anything else. its a fact both are plain bvb winners. nothing beats grief and nothing beats forti because of the huge defence and 300%ed. ok, another point was after the first ladder season a grief ba was pretty expensive after a reset. and if you want to create a big community, you have to create attractive entry rules.)
- max. 45% damage reduction(we could have said, 35% is the cap, but you would be forced to use rare belts only and it wouldnt be fun especially for entry players. so dungo is a cool thing in certain setups as we can see in here. also the replenishment cap is related to verdungos)

creating rules is one of the most important things in a pvp area. capping ow and replenishment, prevents lame play style. we wanted fun and agressive matches.
capping the damage reduction at 45% is the best break even point for every possible rare/unique/magic/crafted item setup. you can wear runewords, rare armors, unique armors, magicals. you can wear verdungos, ow belt or rare belts. you can wear runewords or rare weapons.

this is something youll notice especially in pubs. everyone looks like the other, beside an armor type change of theyre fortis.
and thats why its fun and even after a couple of years so many ppl follow those rules, because they are absolutly unbeaten in flexibility.
believe me we thought so many nights about a rules change or some different setups, how can it be more attractive or more flexible.



This post was edited by Fek on Mar 9 2017 08:55am
Member
Posts: 31,637
Joined: Aug 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 9 2017 09:54am
thx for looking up derguns comment on this :)
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 9 2017 01:05pm
Quote (Breee @ 9 Mar 2017 15:15)
Nope it should not be allowed.

Why argue about rules that have been refined over a long period of time, by a large amount of people?
Why even have doubts on the rules, if you are not confident that it is correct?
Do you really think it was banned for no reason, when alot of people said they want it to be removed from the AoW environment?

All the old BvBs here have made more than 5000+ duels over years, and they set the rules and refined them together.
Rules are rules, if you don't like the AoW rules, play FFA.

just my opinion of course.


Yes I agree. But why cant we test it, like 4 guys already said, and then see further..
Member
Posts: 30,192
Joined: Dec 9 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 9 2017 01:25pm
Quote (Klaasje123 @ 9 Mar 2017 21:05)
Yes I agree. But why cant we test it, like 4 guys already said, and then see further..


You guyd should also test " Anya Quest " :O It's bugged you know, so...

This post was edited by TR0LLFACE on Mar 9 2017 01:27pm
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 9 2017 01:57pm
Quote (TR0LLFACE @ 9 Mar 2017 21:25)
You guyd should also test " Anya Quest " :O It's bugged you know, so...


:rofl:
Member
Posts: 62,135
Joined: Jun 14 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 100%
Mar 9 2017 02:08pm
Quote (Klaasje123 @ 9 Mar 2017 20:05)
Yes I agree. But why cant we test it, like 4 guys already said, and then see further..



you are a free person
but notice : servers will collapse if u do so B)
Member
Posts: 31,637
Joined: Aug 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 9 2017 02:21pm
Member
Posts: 23,712
Joined: Jan 16 2014
Gold: 1,400.00
Mar 10 2017 11:56am
Quote (Klaasje123 @ 9 Mar 2017 22:05)
Yes I agree. But why cant we test it, like 4 guys already said, and then see further..


For a fact. In 1 or 2 or 3 tournaments there is about 500 duels. ( ONLY )

In year, only 1 person duel more than 500 duels in aow.

Tournaments arent right place to test if you want REALLY to change codex.

Codex is meny years job work. Respect that work. And if you cant, play FFA
Member
Posts: 15,637
Joined: Dec 22 2013
Gold: 1,493.00
Mar 10 2017 12:15pm
Quote (Risto @ 10 Mar 2017 19:56)
For a fact. In 1 or 2 or 3 tournaments there is about 500 duels. ( ONLY )

In year, only 1 person duel more than 500 duels in aow.

Tournaments arent right place to test if you want REALLY to change codex.

Codex is meny years job work. Respect that work. And if you cant, play FFA


why u keep thinking I dont respect the rules?
I just think we CAN possibly allowing ebug prudence in the future.. And ofc we need to do tests first.. no doubt ;)
e; Perhaps not in the codex, but in any 'standard' tour if (most) people liked it.

This post was edited by Klaasje123 on Mar 10 2017 12:16pm
Go Back To Diablo 2 Discussion Topic List
Prev11112131415Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll