Has anyone compared the two with equal weapons at a high level? As I'm leveling up it's hard to tell what is stronger.

2H is great for splash and big crits, but the speed of dual claws/swords is good too... but neither seems to really have a big advantage over another.

2hd is better for killing everything.

Tried it and held true. Even having loads of focus on 2hd was more dps

no shield on a zerker ... specially melee is not a good idea.

dual claws if your build revolves around dropping armor because of the passive 50% armor bonus.

2hand if you don't focus on dropping armor. But it still depends on build.

Build so far just revolving around passives, using cold steel mastery + stormclaw, and shadow burst mainly for survival. Planning on picking up northern rage and focusing on ice skills mostly.

A vast variety of berserker skills are based off of weapon damage.

Depends on build & play style.

i like

wut

I went dual claw on my zerker..he's only 67 atm..2 jade claws each with 5% crit. I attack insanely fast...crits heal me and I crit all the time even out of my full charge bar. It's almost impossible for me to die now.

The only thing that was killing me was knockback...so I put knockback gems in my gear...93% atm..I barely move when they try to knock me back. As for killing groups w/ aoe damage..if you get the passive for it...your crits hit the monsters around you..I blow through dungeons np..so far my highest crit with raze has been 24k..but my gear aside from my claws isn't anything special yet.

I tried 2h..and it definitely doesn't go through dungeons this fast lol.

Oh..and the armor gained on hit stacks...so for most of the dungeon I cap out at 2118 phys armor ^.^