Quote (zarkadon @ 21 Jul 2017 13:50)
The thing is, if the player signs a contract with a release clause, the club can always say "you agreed to this release clause, so pay it or stfu". Without it the player can always say the club is betraying him, treating him like property, etc. Release clauses make the contracts more solid imo, because it's basically having the player say "I'm ok with my club not selling me if there isn't an offer of at least xxxx€", which gives the club leverage in potential negotiations. It ensures that if a player decides to leave against the club's will, the club willl at least get a compensation they considered fair when they made the contract. I do agree though that players should over all honor their contracts more often in today's football, but in any case I think that we shouldn't let corporations (in this case football clubs) be the ones that set the limit to the the freedom of worker movement.
thats the thing, the amount of compensation you considered fair when making the contract might not really be fair a year or two later
leading to more ridiculous amounts, like that one schalke talent, who isnt even near the first team, but at least he has a 50mio buy out
contracts have become an instrument to keep prices high, even players that will leave for certain in a year or two get 5 year deals
agreements between clubs and players should be more related to actual reality
or they should have a cancelation period like everyone else has it, however that would make the players cry
This post was edited by ampoo on Jul 21 2017 06:44am