wait a moment, he's a striker? after watching the euros i was convinced he was a defender - those clearances were top notch. although, now that you mention it - it always was the opponent's goal, right? damn, 35M is ridiculous...

There's a defender named Mlik

I could not be more happy dutch clubs finally get some decent money for players. But 35m for a striker that half of the season was benched due to bad performance. Subbed in the game for the championship. Thats just too much.

If we are going to compare players with their EC performances, Müller wouldn't even be a professional player

Milik is a pretty good striker from what I've seen, 35m would be alot, but in this day and age not that crazy.

Well he is young and from Ajax, that never seems to hurt either. He isn't that good yet tho.

This post was edited by CpTJenJen on Jul 27 2016 03:59am

watch it mill

I'm saying that judging a player from one tournament is a stupid thing to do.

sure, müller indeed had a terrible tournament - no one is denying that. he has, however, already shown at the highest level (world cups, champions league) how good he is, while milik has bagged a couple of goals in the polish and the dutch league...

i mean sure, he is still young and coul prove to be decent, but 35M IS ridiculous for a player with such obvious shortcomings - even in these days. just because many clubs overpay like that it doesn't mean it's not crazy... but i guess it's still better business than what arsenal have (not) done yet again, so i get why you would defend this transfer...

I'd rather have milik than muller

This post was edited by chelsea11 on Jul 27 2016 06:08am

Gorilla+landmower