Quote (Pozer @ Jul 24 2016 01:33pm)
Just because they want to go to Typical Germans, it doesn't mean the club has to bend over backwards and allow them to.
Leverkusen flat out refused to sell Vidal to them and he had to settle for Juventus.
lol its not like it happens in the fifa game m8.. hummels had 1 year left on his contract.. so next year he would join bayern for free.. sure bvb could keep him for 1 more year.. like they did with lewandowski.. but they want a big change in their team and thats the reason why they need the money. and ye.. other teams offered money for hummels.. but the player also need to say YES before an offer can be accepted.. and bayern was the only option for him.. bvb had 2 choices.. keep him and loosing good money which they need to change the team.. or sell hummels to bayern where he would go anyway in the next year..
about gotze.. do you know what a buy out clause is? i think no.. thiago also had a buy out clause.. bayern bought him AGAINST the will of barcelona for cheap money.. i dont want to explain it.. instead.. turn your brain on.
about lewandowski.. similar to hummels.. but bvb decided to keep him.. even real madrid offered VERY good money for lewandowski after he scored 4 times against them.. but as i already said.. a player can insert a veto.. BOTH parties (player and club) need to agree with each other before a trade with an other club can take place.
about vidal.. yep you are right.. leverkusen refused an offer by munich.. BUT leverkusen is not dortmund.. leverkusen was not even qualified for the CL.. and a rising player like vidal did not want to waste his time.. so he had 2 choices.. stay in leverkusen until his contract expires so he can join bayern.. or join a much better club than leverkusen to increase his reputation.
better change your sport.. your knowledge about football is ridiculous.. im looking forward to your answer.. but i think you will ignore me to go your embarrassment out of the way.