Quote (SeaBas @ 2 Dec 2010 20:58)
Why would we go for a country in which the situation is 'slowly getting better' when there is a choice between 100 countries that are already far more developed and have a lot better location and a longer football history?
BECAUSE IT'S NEW
AND INTERESTING
AND SOMETHING THAT HAS NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE.
AND MAKING THE WC ORGANIZING MORE WIDESPREAD AROUND THE WORLD
Not the same old same old. Jesus,what's important is the football being played.
Why would you give a fuck about football history? If so then why did you even mention giving it to Belgium or something in another thread?
Far more developed? Check back in 12 years when their ambitious children have grown into men dreaming of a WC that is being held in their own country.
The stadiums will be more awesome than ever,and the climate won't be a problem since there's airconditioning
This post was edited by dng-andre on Dec 2 2010 01:42pm