Amazing.

Now you've gone and done it.

Comparing a def mid (busquets) a deep playmaker (xavi) and a supporting one with a box-to-boxer which took pelanties.

This post was edited by B4al on Jun 3 2015 04:24pm

Iniesta is more of a attacking midfielder.
Sorry brah, but none of them can beat the lamps
Look at the assists aswell

Iniesta doesn't get in the box, never ever, he only dictates play. usually was alongside xavi near mid line. Went to wing and into more attacking positions, but almost never shoots on goal.

Lampard : took free kicks for ages, took pelanties for ages, took corners for ages and went into the box very often.

You're comparing different type of midfielders.

Its like comparing those stats to Zidane and stupidly concluding Lamps was the better out of the 2.

Xavi is imo best midfielder ever, iniesta top 10, zidane top 5 and lampard perhaps top 20-50

Imo pirlo is the best ever. And I would include lamps in top 10

You're a disgrace to humanity.

orian has the logic of Vincent Tan, he would call a keeper bad since he hasnt score yet.

^^^^^^^

bandwagoner loves stats then. Here's a couple for you:

Sunderland has more English League Titles/Nottingham Forrest has more European Cups/UCL than your tiny little dirty oil money laundering club.