Quote (schnoig2 @ 6 Aug 2016 15:31)
Its simple. I watch a post-match discussion on itv with thierry henry an other guests and i think: "well this stuff is very professional and objective"
Same with french tv for example.
Then i switch to the same thing on zdf and ard or even sky, with kahn, scholl, breitner, beckenbauer or sammer. And its the usual stereotype style of blabla i hear there.
You guys get one sided information and opinions. Its a plus if you understand 5 languages, you get different opinions of the same objectiv.
Serie A = shit league is mostly a german opinion (from the media)
Thats my opinion, i can be wrong, just saying.
Berlusconi gone - Overall not a bad thing for the italian football, imo.
Nowhere ever did any German media (or TV expert for that matter) accuse Serie A of being shit.
There were several reports (probably true) about players' wages not being paid by like 70% of Serie A and Serie B teams... just like there were many reports on the decline of viewer interest in Serie A both in the stadiums (mainly because they looked like crap and needed general renovation) and on TV (probably also true).
But the Italian style and quality of football was never in question. Not even questioned by crappy / aggressive newspapers like BILD and for sure not by TV experts (both Kahn and Scholl told many times how tactically evolved Serie A / Italian football was).
Breitner and Beckenbauer are basically idiots. And every German football fan knows that. That's why they're not invited as "experts" for post-match analysis and stuff. They're mainly part of various talk shows where they smash heads with other idiots (like Waldemar Hartmann), so again it's a sure thing nobody takes them seriously.
Where they (the experts, not the newspapers) DO have a clear opinion is English football on the other hand... but tbh there is nothing wrong with telling the truth.
A truth that many interested viewers around the world already know: PL might be the most exiting to watch (for people that don't care about tactics, but about names), might even be the most competitive league where many clubs could win a title. BUT that doesn't mean shit as long as even those competing top teams like Chelsea, Man United, City, Tottenham and others are basically on the same tactical level as German/Dutch/Spanish/Italian youth teams and thus irrelevant whenever it comes to winning something like CL versus international clubs that have the same (or at least close to the same) money to spend.
In other words:
A random German/Italian/Dutch/Spanish team would need much less funds to build a team on par with a random English team.
With the same funds on both sides, said random German/Italian/Dutch/Spanish team would probably beat the random English team 99% of the time.
Back to topic:
I still believe getting rid of Berlusconi was the best thing that oculd happen to Milan, no question.
There might have been another way to get back to the top though, like relying on their own youth instead of relying on an investor, like Dortmund did when they were basically finished.
This post was edited by aneas on Aug 6 2016 10:17am