Quote (fender @ 23 Jun 2016 23:20)
this. i don't understand how ppl don't get it. just look at some of the matches and some of the teams qualifying, just look at the statistics... so far, the goal average (1.92 per game) is the second lowest in the history of the euros...
also, it added some additional elements of randomness and disadvantages for some teams just based on their initial group draw: playing the last group matches at the same time (which obviously still makes sense) was somewhat undermined by 3rd place teams of different groups competing against each other.
furthermore, the added round means that some teams that won their group get to face teams that came 3rd while others have to play teams that came second. some teams that finished 2nd get to play other 2nd placed teams while others have to play group winners...
don't get me wrong, i sure love the little football fairytales that happen (like iceland, hungary, ireland...) - but it's not like that was impossible with the 16 team tournament (greece 2004, russia 2008...)
like i said even before the qualification round started, this was a stupid decision, purely based on the desire to make more money from the tournament. giving teams an incentive to play for a draw rather than a win is always bad...
both these games were onesided as fuck, i don't see how you came to the conclusion they played "amazingly well" - they only tried not to concede too many goals, praying that the stupid mode will keep them in the tournament. that's EXACTLY what leads to teams crowding their boxes with 10 players and low scoring overall...
Had no clue about this statistic, but so far not surprised !!!