Quote (serwork @ May 6 2014 12:29am)
What exactly do you think we did in the 70s?
Don't see any difference? So you don't think Chelsea, City and PSG etc. have had an advantage using money on players and wages from money they have not earned, basically money handed over?
There are no business relations in it either, It's just rich men having expensive toys that they can fund..
It's not like Liverpool are the poorest side in football so you could complain. As statistics shows Liverpool are actually the 2nd or 3rd top spending english team since the beggining of the EPL era. They don't buy that much of a expensive players but they buy a lot of players, a decent part of them useless. No one cry when United bought the best players in the 90's without any competition for them.